Radius x Height: Unpacking the Mystery of Volume in Cubes

AI Thread Summary
The volume of a cone is calculated using the formula 1/3 pi R^2 h, which results in cubic units because height adds a third dimension. Multiplying different dimensions, such as radius and height, is valid and contributes to the overall volume, as shown in the equation X^2 * Z = X^3. Each variable represents a length, and when combined, they yield a volume measurement in cubic units. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing units in mathematical operations to ensure correct dimensional analysis. Ultimately, multiplying three lengths always results in volume, confirming the consistency of dimensionality in geometry.
squarkman
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,
The volume of a cone is 1/3 pi R^2 h.
Why then is the answer in units cubed. Certainly the h is contributing a third dimension but in general math you don't see this happening
X^2 * Z = X^3
but the below is true
X^2 * X = X^3

Can a radius be multiplied by a height to make the dimension increase?
What's going on here?
Thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Of course you can multiply by a height to make the dimension increase. X^2 * X = X^3 means you are multiplying the same variable. You can replace with Z and your new value is not X^3, but ZX^2 which has units of length cubed. Think of a rectangle with width X, length Y, and height Z. Surely you multiply them all together and you get length-cubed dimensions. X, Y, and Z all represent different lengths, but they represent length none-the-less.
 
In fact, this can be used for error checking. If you arrived at an answer that should be volume and you end up with units of length squared, you know you did something wrong.
 
squarkman said:
Hi,
The volume of a cone is 1/3 pi R^2 h.
Why then is the answer in units cubed. Certainly the h is contributing a third dimension but in general math you don't see this happening
X^2 * Z = X^3
but the below is true
X^2 * X = X^3

Can a radius be multiplied by a height to make the dimension increase?
What's going on here?
Thx
You are not distinguishing between numbers and their units. (X m)2(Z m)= (X2Z) m3, just as (X m)(Y m)(Z m)= (XYZ) m3.

If you multiply three length measurements together, the result is alway in volume units whether the lengths themselves are the same or not.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top