How long ago did the wooly mammoth disappear from North America?

  • Thread starter chawkdee
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the discovery of wooly mammoth bones in North America and the calculation of how long ago the animal disappeared from the continent using its 14C activity per gram of carbon. Two methods are suggested - calculating the number of half-lives or using the differential equation dN/dt = -λN - and it is noted that they are essentially the same. The conversation ends with gratitude for the help provided.
  • #1
chawkdee
12
0
Bones of the wooly mammoth have been found in North America. The youngest of these bones has a 14C activity per gram of carbon that is about 21% of what was present in the live animal. How long ago (in years) did this animal disappear from North America?

I'm struggling with this problem - is it simply a mathematical problem - working out how many half-lives (5730 years) cause 21% to be left?
Or, do i have top work out the Decay constant λ then use ΔN/Δt = -λ N ?

If it is simply a mathematical Can anyone tell me how to do it please.
If I have to find the Decay constant, I'm still stumped on the mathematics involved.

Thanks for any help.

Chawkdee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You just need the ratio of N_now, N_orig and the half life.
The equation is derived here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-life

c737eed649e864cc426cfc4c133bb49d.png


Hint, estimate how many half lives you would need to get 25% of the c14 left - it's easy to get logs the wrong way around in the calculator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Well, both methods are mathematical! There is no difference between them. The differential equation dN/dt = -λN has an exponentially decaying solution: N(t) = N0e-λt, where the constant N0 is the original amount.

You can easily express this as an exponential function having base 2 instead of base e. That will tell you the relation between the half-life and λ. That is how the two methods are related. That having been said, since you already know the half-life, you can probably use the first method you suggested.
 
  • #4
Thanks a lot - great help!
 

1. What is radioactive dating and how does it work?

Radioactive dating is a method used to determine the age of rocks and other materials by measuring the amount of radioactive elements they contain. This is possible because radioactive elements decay at a constant rate, known as a half-life, which allows scientists to calculate the age of a material based on how much of the radioactive element is left.

2. What types of materials can be dated using radioactive dating?

Radioactive dating can be used on a variety of materials, including rocks, fossils, and even some human-made artifacts. The most commonly used radioactive elements for dating are carbon-14, uranium-238, and potassium-40.

3. How accurate is radioactive dating?

The accuracy of radioactive dating depends on a number of factors, such as the type of material being dated and the half-life of the radioactive element being used. Generally, it is considered to be a very reliable method of determining the age of materials, with an accuracy range of 1-5%. However, certain factors such as contamination or leaching of the radioactive element can affect the accuracy of the results.

4. How does radioactive dating support the theory of evolution?

Radioactive dating is an important tool in the study of evolution because it allows scientists to determine the age of fossils and rocks, which can provide evidence for the gradual changes in species over time. By dating different layers of rock or fossils from different time periods, scientists can build a timeline of the Earth's history and the evolution of life on it.

5. What are some limitations of radioactive dating?

While radioactive dating is a valuable tool, it does have some limitations. It can only be used on materials that contain radioactive elements, and the accuracy of the results can be affected by factors such as contamination or the presence of multiple radioactive elements. Additionally, the method is not suitable for dating materials that are younger than 100,000 years old.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
67
Views
10K
Replies
14
Views
15K
Back
Top