Raman Wavefunction: Rayleigh & Raman Scattering Implications

ixx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Regarding Rayleigh and Raman scattering:

I'm trying to understand the implications of the Raman wavefunction, being time independent. It certainly makes the derivation of the resonance Raman cross-section simple, but I'm struggling to understand the role of the imaginary component, especially in bound states.

And can anyone help me figure out which electronic transition is responsible for atmospheric Rayleigh in molecular nitrogen? My intuitions say it's the B3Pi -> A3Sigma, but I've found no literature sources for that yet.

Any insight is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks! Raman scattering is an inelastic light scattering process, which occurs when light interacts with molecular vibrations and rotations. The incident light excites a molecule from its ground state to an excited state and the scattered light is shifted in energy, resulting in an observable change in wavelength. This phenomenon is known as a Raman shift. In bound states, the imaginary component of the wavefunction describes the probability of the system transitioning from one energy level to another. In the case of atmospheric Rayleigh scattering in molecular nitrogen, the main electronic transition responsible is the A2Σ+-->X2Σ+ transition. This transition involves the promotion of an electron from the ground state of the nitrogen molecule to its first electronically excited state. This transition is responsible for most of the Rayleigh scattering in the atmosphere.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top