Random variables that are triple-wise independent but quadruple-wise dependent

CantorSet
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, here's a probability problem that seems really counter-intuitive to me:

Find four random variables taking values in {-1, 1} such that any three are independent but all four are not. Hint: consider products of independent random variables.

My thoughts:
From a set perspective, there are no four sets such that any three are disjoint but all four overlap somewhere.

But according to the hint, let X_{i} be a random variable taking values 1 with probability p_{i} and -1 with probability 1-p_{i} for all i \in N. Then, I guess our four random variables will be products of these X_{i}'s but how should one construct them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the solution for pairwise independent (3 events) but not all three (you can generalize to 4).

Four elementary events (j,k,l,m), each probability 1/4.
A=(j,k)
B=(j,l)
C=(j,m)
P(A)=P(B)=P(C)=1/2
P(A*B)=P(A*C)=P(B*C)=1/4=P(A)P(B)=P(A)P(C)=P(B)P(C) (independent)
P(A*B*C)=1/4, P(A)P(B)P(C)=1/8 (not independent)
 
For your problem work with 8 elementary events (G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N) each with Prob.=1/8 and 4 events of interest(A,B,C,D). Use the following table:
__G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N
A-1-1-1-1-0-0-0-0
B-1-1-0-0-1-1-0-0
C-1-0-1-0-1-0-1-0
D-1-0-0-1-0-1-1-0

1 means in the set, 0 means not in.

If you calculate the probabilities, you will see they are independent in 2's and 3's, but not all 4.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top