Rate at Which 2 Masses & Springs Exchange Energy

AI Thread Summary
Simulations of a two mass-three springs oscillator reveal that energy exchange occurs between the masses, with one mass oscillating while the other remains nearly stationary. The oscillation can be predicted using differential equations, showing two modes: one where the masses are in phase and another where they are out of phase, with differing frequencies. The combined oscillation can be expressed as a sum of cosine functions, leading to a modulation at the mean frequency. The power transfer between the masses can be analyzed using the relationship between energy and amplitude. Understanding these dynamics allows for predicting the rate of energy exchange between the masses.
dimensionless
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
I ran some simulations with a two mass-three springs oscillator. I found that one mass would oscillate for a while and then almost stop. When that happened the other would start moving back and forth. Is there a way I can predict at what rate the masses will exchange energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. If you write down the two differential equations, you can verify that the solution is a mix of two modes of oscillation.
a) One with the two masses en phase. In this case the central spring does nothing and the frequency is given just by the spring constant and the mass.
b) Another with the two masses in opposition of phase. This time the frequency is higher.
When you add the two modes, you should obtain something like: [y_1]=A_1\cos\omega_1t + A_2\cos\omega_2t
[y_2]=A_1\cos\omega_1t - A_2\cos\omega_2t
You can work this result in the form:
\cos\left({\omega_1+\omega_2\over 2}t\right) \cos\left({\omega_1-\omega_2\over 2}t\right)
This gives and oscillation at the mean frequency, modulated by a sinusoid at half the frequency difference.
As you kown the dependency of energy with amplitude, you can work the power transfer between the two masses.
 
Last edited:
It looks like your using the identity
cos{C} + cos{B} = 2 cos{\frac{C+B}{2}}cos{\frac{C-B}{2}}
Would this identity still work if my coefficient for y_{n} have values other than A_{n} = 1?
 
Last edited:
Not directly, but you can always split things as:
[y_1]=A_1\cos\omega_1t + A_2\cos\omega_2t= A_1\left(\cos\omega_1t + \cos\omega_2t \right) + (A_2-A_1) \cos\omega_2t
There is a constant amplitude term and a variable one.
 
If I implement the identity from here, won't it more or less bring me back to where I started? My goal is to figure out the rate at which the masses exchange energy.
 
Do as you like. But I know what I said.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top