Ratio of cosmic and cosmogenic radiation

  • Thread starter Thread starter snorkack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation Ratio
AI Thread Summary
Air effectively blocks most cosmic radiation, with an estimated exposure of around 300 microsieverts per year at sea level. Some cosmic radiation induces nuclear reactions in the atmosphere, creating stable and short-lived isotopes. The heaviest common nucleus in the air is O-16, while only four lighter isotopes are radioactive, each with long half-lives. Muons constitute over half of the cosmic radiation detected at sea level, with the rest being electrons, positrons, and photons from cascade events. Understanding the ratio of cosmogenic to cosmic radiation at sea level requires analyzing cosmic radiation attenuation and its induced activity in various environments.
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
Air stops most cosmic radiation.
Yet some particles do reach sea level.
The cosmic radiation at sea level is estimated at around 300 microsieverts per year.
Cosmic radiation also causes nuclear reactions in air that stops it.
Many isotopes created by cosmic radiation are stable, or short lived and remain in air.
Heaviest common nucleus in air is O-16. Of nuclei lighter than 16, only 4 are radioactive but have half-life over 21 minutes. These are T (12 years), Be-7 (53 days), Be-10 (1,5 million years) and C-14 (5700 years).
What is the ratio of cosmogenic radiation to cosmic radiation on sea level?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
snorkack said:
What is the ratio of cosmogenic radiation to cosmic radiation on sea level?
It's an interesting question. I'm trying to find a good answer. One has to look at the attenuation of cosmic radiation, and types, and then look at the induced-activity in the air and at the surface - water vs plant vs mineral.

Muons make up more than half of the cosmic radiation at sea level, the remainder being mostly electrons, positrons and photons from cascade events. (Richtmyer)
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/cosmic.html#c2

See Figure 24.3 http://pdg.lbl.gov/2011/reviews/rpp2011-rev-cosmic-rays.pdf

Some information on cosmogenic production here - http://www.whoi.edu/fileserver.do?id=133844&pt=2&p=146949
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...

Similar threads

Back
Top