Ratio of mass moment of inertia to mass

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the resultant translational force of a wheel subjected to an applied force at the axle, considering both translational and rotational inertia. The correct formula for angular acceleration (aa) is derived as aa = F * r / (moi + m * r^2), where F is the applied force, moi is the mass moment of inertia, m is the mass, and r is the radius. Participants emphasize the incompatibility of adding mass and moment of inertia directly and suggest focusing on energy/work done for complex scenarios. The final ratio of forces is established as linear force divided by angular force, specifically mass * radius * radius / moment of inertia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass moment of inertia (moi)
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
  • Familiarity with Newton's second law (F = ma)
  • Knowledge of torque and its relationship to angular acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between torque and angular acceleration in rotating systems
  • Explore energy conservation principles in rotational motion
  • Learn about the dynamics of rigid body motion
  • Investigate the effects of friction on rotational and translational motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating bodies and the interplay between linear and angular forces.

WildEnergy
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi

Thinking about a simple stable wheel at rest on a flat surface
with a force applied at the axle parallel to the ground
trying to work out the resultant translational force

(note: no slipping, static friction is very high, no rolling resistance)

I think it is the ratio between the mass moment of inertia (I) of the wheel
and the total inertia (translational and rotational)

resultant = force * mass / (mass + moi)
-- and --
friction = force * moi / (mass + moi)

is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not clear what you are asking. What is 'resultant translational force'?

Passing over that for the moment, there is no physical meaning to the addition of mass and moment of inertia, the dimensions are totally incompatible.
 
AJ Bentley said:
It is not clear what you are asking. What is 'resultant translational force'?

some of the force is used up overcoming the rotational inertia - this is what remains?

AJ Bentley said:
Passing over that for the moment, there is no physical meaning to the addition of mass and moment of inertia, the dimensions are totally incompatible.

that is what I was afraid of

I am trying to work out the acceleration of a wheel with a force applied
thinking it would be less than f/m because of the angular momentum of rotating the wheel
 
This is actually quite a tricky problem (to me anyway!)

In this sort of situation, one normally abandons the force/acceleration route and concentrates instead on energy/work done considerations. But here, you are specifically asking for the force.

The only way I can see of solving it is to consider how much force you need to apply (at the axle) to provide the necessary torque to get the wheel rotating at the desired speed and to add to that the force required to also get the wheel moving linearly at the same speed. You'll need to bear in mind that the wheel velocity will be it's angular rotational speed over 2*pi*r.

Your initial gut-feeling about f=ma is correct.
 
I found this idea in a book:

F = original force, aa = angular acceleration, m = mass, r = radius, moi = moment of inertia

friction = F - translation
friction = F - m * a
friction = F - m * aa * r
torque =
friction * r =
r * (F - m * aa * r) = moi * aa
F * r - m * aa * r^2 = moi * aa
aa = F * r / (moi + m * r^2)

I was so damn close yesterday but my maths let me down
being bad at both maths and physics really sucks
 
after checking my original attempt I realized I was on the right track
but had made one small mistake, in fact my solution seems superior to the one written by nasa

ratio of forces = linear force / angular force
ratio of forces = mass * radius * radius / moment of inertia

simple!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K