Rational approach for specifying a Microscope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting a suitable microscope for academic microbiological research, specifically focusing on phase contrast models within a budget of approximately $2,000. Key considerations include the importance of camera and computer interfaces, as well as the need for reliable sales and support from dealers. While major brands like Olympus, Leica, Nikon, and Zeiss are highlighted for their quality, there is skepticism about the value of cheaper alternatives, particularly from lesser-known manufacturers. Users emphasize the significance of understanding specific requirements, such as imaging techniques and magnifications, to make an informed choice. Concerns are raised about the reliability of off-brand microscopes, which may lack adequate support and quality assurance, especially for inexperienced users. Recommendations include exploring established brands and considering the potential benefits of investing in quality instruments that come with dependable customer service.
NSK8700
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Has anyone worked out a functional Parametric chart that enables one to choose a appropriate Microscope (exclude Scanning electron MicroScopes(MS)) amongst the multitude of choices for a modern academic micro-biological & research lab, hence formulated a general guideline? The MS should feature a Camera and computer interface as a requirement.Please highlight some IMPORTANT Technical Spec's,constructs and feature options to be considered for a judicious choice.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
mgb_phys: Thanks !
I suppose the list you have provided is from "premium" brands/vendors, who have established branding and sophistication of manufacturing style and systems.Any ideas on what contributes to pricing differentials if the technology/ design has not changed radically to provide for some significant scientific benefits. How about cost efficient manufacturers like : www.alltion-microscope.com[/url] oR [url]http://www.meijitechno.com/[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You gave us no clues about what you want to use the microscope forbrightfield, fluorescence, stereo, live cells, immunostaining, tissue slices, needed magnifications (or frame rates for dynamic imaging)...

There's a lot of things a good microscope can do. In all honesty, at the high end, it's less about the specific instrument and more about the sales/support person who will help you when you get stuck.

If you have absolutely no idea, I recommend at least browsing through 'MicroscopyU' to see all the different techiques available.
 
Andy R Thanks, actually I was looking for some clue to get started. Actually the requirement is a Phase contrast Microscope with a stipulated budget (say around US$2000.- (+/-)6% permissible allowance [@ 1US$=47,50 and inclusive of applicable Customs]. I am presently getting to know principles and pertinent aspects - Anyone who has got some deep experience to sharing any thing (however trivial) in a relevant context (accessories, features & functionality differences between vendors,etc) will be appreciated gratefully.
 
You will have a hard time finding a phase contrast microscope for $2k. Is this for cell/tissue culture (i.e. live cell imaging)? The Nikon TMS is decent, and Lecia and Zeiss make comparable models.
 
Andy, are there chinese clone microscopes out yet?
In theodolites you can buy exact copies of Nikon, Leica etc from China-optical for 1/2-1/4 the price.

Not even clones - they are made on the same production line that Nikon outsourced to, they even advertise on facing pages in the surveying magazines.
 
I don't know much about the chinese clones, but I'm sure they exist. The Russian (LOMO) and Polish (PZO) microscope optics are reasonable. My experience with off-brands is not good. Yes, they are cheaper and generally sort-of work ok, but I have a lot of experience building and modifying microscopes so I can deal with (for example) poor sample stages and flake-y light sources.

Since the OP sounds very inexperienced, I wouldn't recommend dealing with a company that does not provide some support service.

Edit: also, a lot of the (American) low-quality microscopes still use DIN standard objectives, which should really be avoided unless there is a good reason not to (i.e. legacy equipment)
 

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top