Rational vs. Polynomial Functions

AI Thread Summary
Rational functions are defined as functions that can be expressed as the ratio of two polynomials. In the discussion, the function f(x)=3x²+2x+1 is identified as a polynomial, while f(x)=(2x²+4x)/(x-1) is classified as a rational function due to its fraction form. The function f(x)=(x-1)^(1/2) is deemed neither rational nor polynomial because it involves a non-integer exponent. There is some confusion regarding the classification of polynomials, with some sources stating that monomials can also be considered polynomials. Clarifications on these definitions helped participants understand the distinctions better.
Lizardjuice7
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In my calc class we are reviewing rational and polynomial functions before we start with the actual calculus part of the course.

In my book we had 3 problems that we had to do for homework and none of my classmates could understand why the book answered them a certain way.

Question:

State whether the functions below are Rational, Polynomial, Neither, or Both.

1. f(x)=3x2+2x+1

2. f(x)=(2x2+4x)/(x-1)

3. f(x)=(x-1)1/2From what I understand a rational function needs to have a fraction bar in it, so number two is rational. Number 3 is raised to the 1/2 power so it is neither. Not rational nor a polynomial. I thought that number one would just be a polynomial, but my teacher's book says it is both. We discussed it in class and couldn't make sense of it.

If someone could explain to me what the functions above are that would be very helpful.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of a rational function is any function that satisfies/can be expressed as

f(x)=\frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}

So when thinking whether (3) is rational or not, think about what happens if Q(x)=1 in this definition.
 
Lizardjuice7, your thinking is fine. Actually a book I have states that monomials can be polynomials (seems strange), giving credibility to jeffreydk's justification.
 
Thanks,

That really helps a lot!

Lizardjuice7
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top