Rationale of the position operator?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the rationale behind the definition of the position operator in quantum mechanics, particularly its representation as multiplication by the variable x in the context of wave functions. Participants explore the implications of this definition in different bases, such as position and momentum space, and the conditions under which it applies.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the intuitive basis for defining the position operator as multiplication by x, suggesting it may simply be a functional aspect of quantum mechanics.
  • Another participant clarifies that multiplication by x is specifically the position operator in the position basis, while in momentum space, the position operator takes a different form involving derivatives.
  • The concept of state collapse upon measurement is introduced, with an explanation of how a definite position leads to a wave function represented by a Dirac delta function.
  • A later post presents a mathematical comparison of two formulas for the expectation value of the position operator, leading to the conclusion that the position operator acts as multiplication by x in its eigenbasis representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the generality of the position operator's definition and its application across different bases, indicating that multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation and implications of the position operator in quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the choice of basis when defining operators in quantum mechanics, as well as the implications of measurement on wave function representation. There are unresolved aspects regarding the broader applicability of the position operator's definition across different contexts.

PerpStudent
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Why is the position operator of a particle on the x-axis defined by x multiplied by the wave function? Is there an intuitive basis for this or is it merely something that simply works in QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiplication by x is not in general the position operator. "x multiplied by the wave function" would be the correct recipe if by wave function you specifically mean the particle's state ket projected onto the position basis, ψ(x)=<x|ψ>. But often people speak about other "wavefunctions" such as the particle's state representation in momentum space, ψ'(p)=<p|ψ>. In the momentum basis, the (one-dimensonal) position operator is \hat{x}=i\hbar\frac{\partial }{\partial p}

Multiplication by x is the position operator only in the position basis. Measuring the position of a particle causes the particle's state to collapse into an eigenstate of the position basis. This means it has a definite position. If you know a particle's position exactly, let's say it's at q along the x-axis, then the probability of finding the particle at q is 100% and the probability of finding it anywhere else is 0%. So if a particle has the definite position q, then its wavefunction in the position basis must look like a dirac delta function centered at q, which would be written δ(x-q).

Multiplying the dirac delta function by x,
xδ(x-q) = qδ(x-q)
since δ(x-q) is zero everywhere except at x=q. You should be able to see that in the position basis, the delta functions are the eigenfunctions of multiplication by x and their eigenvalues are equal to their position.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, that's very helpful.
 
Look at the 2 formulas for the expectation of the position operator:
<br /> \langle \hat{x} \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{x \, \psi^{\ast}(x) \, \psi(x) \, dx} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\psi^{\ast}(x) \, \hat{x} \, \psi(x) \, dx}<br />
This has to be true for all possible wave functions. Comparing the 2, we conclude that:
<br /> \hat{x} \, \psi(x) = x \, \psi(x)<br />
This is generally true for every operator in its own eigenbasis representation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K