Ray matrix - refraction at a curved surface

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 7K views
8614smith
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram shows a curved convex surface with radius of curvature R separating two media with differing refractive indices of [tex]n_{1}[/tex] and [tex]n_{2}[/tex]
raymatrix.jpg

Show that the matrix representing refraction at this surface is [tex]\left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{1}{R}\left(\frac{n_1}{n_2}-1\right)}\stackrel{0}{\frac{n_1}{n_2}}\right][/tex]

In your derivation you may assume that [tex]\sqrt{1-{x^2}}{\approx}1-\frac{x^2}{2}[/tex] and that the slope of a curved surface [tex]\theta_s[/tex] may be approximated by [tex]\theta_{s}{\approx}\frac{dx}{dy}[/tex]

Homework Equations



refraction matrix: [tex]{r_t2}={R_2}{r_i2}[/tex] where [tex]{R_2}=\left[\stackrel{1}{0}\stackrel{-D_2}{1}\right][/tex] and [tex]{D_2}=\frac{{n_t2}-{n_i2}}{R_2}[/tex]

Transfer matrix: [tex]\left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{d_2_1}{n_t_1}}\stackrel{0}{1}\right][/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


using the refraction equation i have got to [tex]\left[\stackrel{1}{0}\stackrel{-\frac{{n_2}-{n_1}}{R}}{1}\right][/tex] and using the transfer matrix i got [tex]\left[\stackrel{1}{\frac{R}{2n_2}}\stackrel{0}{1}\right][/tex]

I'm not too sure what to do from here, I've multiplied them both by each other both ways round and neither way got the right answer, I am unsure even whether this is the right way to do it.

i assume that the aprroximation it gives has something to do with the equation of a circle but i don't know how to use it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will have to use the refraction equation, but you need to be careful when computing the refraction at the interface since the interface is at an angle. So it is dependent on [itex]y_1[/itex], assuming [itex]y[/itex] is your interface axis.

Also since it is an interface, you know [itex]y_1=y_2[/itex] so the top of the matrix is (1 0). The bottom of the matrix will take some work.