Rayleigh Ritz with two Particles

wduff
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I have what should be a simple one to answer.

I'm solving for 2 particles in a harmonic oscillator with a gaussian bump in the middle and a delta function interaction. I'm doing all this via Rayleigh Ritz; that is, diagonalizing the Hamiltonian to find the constants in:

\Psi = \sum_{ij} c_{ij} \psi_{ij}

Where ##\Psi_{ij}## is just the standard symmetrized 2 boson wavefunction with ##\psi_{i}## and ##\psi_{j}## in a harmonic oscillator basis.

My issue is this: I end up with a rank 4 tensor: \langle \psi_{ij}|H|\psi_{kl}\rangle

I'm sure this is just inexperience, but I have no idea how to get an eigensystem out of that (I'm using mathematica). I've already done it with one particle (minus the delta function of course), which was simple enough, since the calculations produced a n x n matrix which I know how to handle. But this is a new one for me.

Any suggestions would be very appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One needs to define a basis of two-particle states, which are themselves the tenor product of single-particle states.

In that two-particle basis, the Hamiltonian will be a 2x2 matrix.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top