RC circuit and Laplace transforms

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Laplace transforms to analyze a simple series RC circuit with a DC source. Participants explore the implications of assuming dE/dt = 0 and its effect on solving the differential equation governing the circuit's behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why they cannot take the Laplace transform of both sides of their differential equation, noting that assuming dE/dt = 0 leads to an incorrect conclusion.
  • Another participant suggests using a specific Laplace transform function to address the lack of a DC component for t > 0.
  • A different participant argues that using Laplace transforms can simplify the problem significantly and emphasizes the importance of transitioning to the Laplace domain early in the analysis.
  • Some participants question the assumption of dE/dt = 0, suggesting that it implies a steady state, which may not be appropriate for the initial conditions of the circuit.
  • There is a discussion about how changing dE/dt to 0 alters the circuit's behavior and the importance of retaining the step function in the analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that assuming dE/dt = 0 leads to a steady state assumption, but there is no consensus on the implications of this assumption for the analysis of the circuit. Multiple competing views on the appropriate approach to using Laplace transforms remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the assumptions made in the analysis, particularly regarding the initial conditions and the treatment of the DC source as a step input. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the correct application of Laplace transforms in this context.

darkfeffy
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I know this should be obvious, but there's something I am just NOT getting.

Imagine a simple series RC circuit with a DC source as shown in the attachment. As can be seen from the picture, I have solved the differential equation in capacitor current in the time domain. In order to be able to solve the problem, I have assumed that dE/dt = 0 as this is a dc source.

I wish to know why I can't take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation (*). I know that Laplace(0) = 0, so this would give a bogus equation (i.e. I(s) = 0, which is wrong). But if my equation (*) is right, then why can't I use the laplace transform of both sides at this point?

From textbooks, I read that the DC source is considered as a step input, thus in the Laplace domain, this would be E/s (in other words, the switch is closed at t=0). So, what is wrong with equation (*)?

Please don't hesitate to point out trivialities.

Thanks for your understanding.
e.
 

Attachments

  • RC circuit.png
    RC circuit.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 2,514
Engineering news on Phys.org
\text{ Try }f(s) = \frac{1}{s-a} \space \text{ for } F(t) = 0 \text { for t <= 0 and } F(t)=e^{at} \text { for } t>0
There is no dc component for t>0. If you want a dc component, then try this online Laplace transform editor:

http://wims.unice.fr/wims/wims.cgi

Put in 1 - ea*t and do Laplace to get
f(s) = \frac{1}{s}-\frac{1}{s-a}
 
First, if you are just using laplace transforms, you should be able to solve this with a lot less steps. The sooner you go into the laplace domain, the easier it is. You rewrite x(t) as X(s). If it is going to be applied as a step function, multiply your source by (1/s). Any function f(t), i(t), v(t) etc. becomes F(s), I(s) and if it is integrated, divide the function by s, and if it is differentiated, multiply by s. When you study the laplace transform in diff eq. it is treated as an operator, something you can multiply, that takes place of the integragtion and differentiation.

The answer to your question though, is that you are integrating zero on the right hand side, and when you integrate 0, you get a constant. To solve for this constant, simply set your time variable to 0, and you will see that your constant is equal to the current, which is equal to V/R. This gives you your voltage as the switch is closed. Substitue V/R into this constant and solve for your current now, and you will see your answer.
 
Last edited:
darkfeffy said:
Hi everyone,

In order to be able to solve the problem, I have assumed that dE/dt = 0 as this is a dc source.

If you assume dE/dt = 0 , doesn't that assume a steady state (i.e the situation long after the switch has been connected)?
 
Also, I thought I should add, when you go to the step of setting your dE/dt to zero, you are basically changing your circuit. How is this? Well, if you start from the very beginning with your first equation, and take the laplace transform, assuming a step input, and then differentiate by multiplying both sides by s in the laplace domain, you end up E(s), rather than 0.

By changing to dE/dt to 0, you are only considering your steady state, and basically removing the step function of the switch.

This is why I recommended starting the laplace transform as soon as possible without nulling out important parts of the equation like your dE/dt.
 
Last edited:
sophiecentaur said:
If you assume dE/dt = 0 , doesn't that assume a steady state (i.e the situation long after the switch has been connected)?

Yes, I think you're right that it is assuming steady state, and the differential equation * is setup as if the switch was already closed to begin with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
1K