RD Thought Experement (wikiversity article)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dmtr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    article
Physics news on Phys.org


Not even wrong?

-- Dmtr.
// 124F2501. You've just been split.
 
Last edited:
First of all:
The path of a photon is not dictated because of some "law of increasing entropy". It's the other way around -- increasing entropy follows from (the statistical averaging of) the dynamics of the photon and the rest of the system (or any other system under consideration). You cannot say that a photon _has_ to choose a path or else the entropy doesn't increase. It simply doesn't work that way.

Second:
Why on Earth would the path of a photon depend on the state /system/ ... of the endpoint of one both paths? Not even wrong indeed.

As for the experiment: the photon choosing the upper path will cause a larger increase in entropy than the lower one. So what? Both paths still cause an increasing entropy, although the lower one causes less. But there is no law of "this event causes more entropy gain, therefore it has to happen more often".

So the only logical conclusion here is that, with the time flow, all the photons would chose the path A.

A statement like that just shows you want your answer and reasoning to be true, while you present hardly any proof to support such a "logical statement".
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top