Re-Entry into Earth's Atmosphere: Understanding Space Ship Speed

AI Thread Summary
Spacecraft re-enter Earth's atmosphere at high speeds primarily due to their initial orbital velocity, which is necessary to maintain orbit against gravitational pull. As they descend, gravity increases their speed, similar to how a dropped object accelerates towards the ground. Rockets generate thrust by expelling fuel at high velocities, which propels the spacecraft forward while the expelled fuel moves backward, adhering to Newton's third law. To manage re-entry and minimize fuel use, spacecraft rely on aerodynamic drag for deceleration, which can generate significant heat. This method of partially slowing down before atmospheric entry is crucial for safe landings, as evidenced by past missions like Apollo 10.
leemuhammad
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How Does a Space Ship reenter the Earth's atmosphere at such a great rate of speed? I understand speed in this way W=F x D. there is nothing in space for the ship to propel itself off to build this great speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you ever considered the change in gravitational potential energy?
 
leemuhammad said:
How Does a Space Ship reenter the Earth's atmosphere at such a great rate of speed? I understand speed in this way W=F x D. there is nothing in space for the ship to propel itself off to build this great speed.

You forgot two important factors:

1. The ship already has a large speed to begin with. Just think of how fast the ship has to move to maintain an orbit at that distance above the earth. If it is stationary with respect to the earth, it'll fall towards the earth. So using basic mechanics, you can easily calculate the speed that it needs to maintain to use the central force from the earth.

2. When it is coming back down to earth, a radial component of the velocity increases mainly due to gravity. Drop a ball and its velocity increases at it races towards the ground. So if it doesn't have any "lift" or thrusters, it will increase in speed by itself due to gravitational force.

Zz.
 
leemuhammad said:
There is nothing in space for the ship to propel itself off to build this great speed.
No one answered the last question. The spaceship emits part of itself (burnt fuel) at a very high rate of speed. The acceleration of the mass of the fuel to high speed generates a force that propels the spaceship forwards, and the spent fuel backwards. The higher the speed of the propellent, the more efficient the rocket engine is (more energy gained per amount of spent fuel emitted).

When launching a space ship, the more final speed you need, the more fuel you need, but the fuel also adds weight. Using solid rocket boosters on the shuttle helps since they are only accelerated to a sub-orbital speed before being detached after they are spent. It took a huge rocket and a lot of fuel to put a man on the moon. The Saturn V weighed 6 million pounds, and started with just 7 million pounds of thrust at lift-off. Again, multiple stages were used, and detached.

To save fuel and costs, rather than use even more fuel to slow down a space ship, the ship is only partially slowed, then relies on aerodynamic drag to do most of the braking, which generates a lot of heat and was the cause of destruction of one of the shuttles. The fastest piloted re-entry speed ever was the Apollo 10 mission where the return was made when the moon was further from Earth than the other mission.

Here is a link to the fastest speeds of manmade objects:

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/ spacecraft /q0260.shtml

Fastest land based objects are rocket sleds, here's another link:

http://www.46tg.af.mil/world_record.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jeff Reid said:
No one answered the last question.

I did!

If you follow your scenario, if you do a "burn" to increase your speed, you'll never get back to Earth from that orbit, unless you turn your ship and point it directly at the earth, which isn't how it is done.

What is done instead is to slow down the ship so that it start falling out of orbit towards the earth. But by doing this, you also pick up a radial component of the speed, meaning you start to fall faster towards the Earth simply via gravity. So the ship can simply "propel" itself using the gravitational field.

Zz.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top