Reactive current to lower the voltage at the generator?

In summary, Bob said that if something is wrong or unclear, please excuse me, I'll try to explain as good as possible! :)
  • #1
Buoyen
1
0
I had a little discussion with a friend about how reactive current influate voltage drop in a distribusion line.

The case:

If I have a generator on one side of a line and a load on the other side. The load needs a specific voltage. Now, I'd need a bit higher voltage on the side with the generator because of the loss in the line. But let's say there was something close to the generator which couldn't handle the extra voltage (another load. f.ex). That means I can't have (much) higher voltage on this side. Then my friend claims that we could minimize the difference in voltage by making a reactive current flow through the line.

I've had some about impedance, reactive current, i etc.. But I don't have a clue about this one. Anyone can tell me about this?

If something is wrong or unclear, please excuse me, I'll trye to explain as good as possible! :)

http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/5823/54660099.th.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think that adding extra reactive current will reduce the voltage drop if the load impedance is real. The actual line current is the quadrature sum of the real and reactive components, which is greater than the real current alone, and the line power loss is I2R. There are some instances when the load is reactive, adding some compensating reactance to the line will help, but not in this case. I would recommend some compensating reactance to the line at the load , like capacitors to correct a VAR, to zero out the reactive current in the line.

There is the special case of the line being a quarter wavelength long, in which case you could make the line a quarter wave transformer, with a low voltage (voltage node) at the generator.

Bob S
 
  • #3
Under the most usual operating conditions, the network is predominantly inductive (the situation also can be inverted at least partially in some cases, e.g., during light load hours, with reactive power generated by lines which are relatively unloaded and increasing voltages from generators to loads) and thus:

-reactive powers absorbed by the network itself (e.g., lines, transformers, terminals of dc links, etc.) must be considered, in addition to reactive powers demanded by loads;
-the transportation of reactive powers from generators to loads would usually imply, in addition to the previously mentioned absorption, unacceptable voltage drops (in the same sense, i.e., from generators to loads) if proper actions are not undertaken within the network as specified in the following.

On the other hand, reactive power injections that can be achieved by generators are generally not sufficient for:

-the matching of the total reactive power demand, because of the limits on generators themselves;
-the accomplishment of an acceptable voltage steady-state, because of the concentration of generators in relatively few “sites” (consistent with technical, environmental constraints etc.).

It is then convenient to intervene also within the transmission and distribution networks and near to loads, for instance by:
- injecting reactive power (usually positive, or possibly negative as mentioned above) using shunt condensers or inductors or, for more general control functions, static or synchronous compensators;
- reducing the total absorbed reactive power using series condensers;
- adjusting voltage levels using tap-changing transformers.

The voltage “support” along a line, aside from that which is intrinsically due to series inductances and shunt capacitances of the line itself:
- may make it possible to have acceptable voltage values at any location (also matching the requirements of possible intermediate loads);
- also can be important in relation to the transfer limit of the active power

Regarding the generic load, the addition of a shunt reactive element to absorb a reactive power Q R, and zero active power, obviously provides the capability to adjust the load voltage and/or the overall required reactive power. As an important additional effect, harmonic and/or flicker filtering can be obtained.
Please refer to attached diagram and formula for determination of end line voltage in addition of a shunt reactive element at a load node case.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Creative thinking is enjoyable, Then think about your surrounding things and other thought products. http://electrical-riddles.com
 

Attachments

  • load flow.GIF
    load flow.GIF
    8.9 KB · Views: 417

1. What is reactive current and how does it affect voltage at the generator?

Reactive current is the flow of electricity that is out of phase with the voltage. It is caused by inductive and capacitive loads in the electrical system. When there is a high amount of reactive current, it can cause a drop in voltage at the generator.

2. How does lowering the voltage at the generator help with reactive current?

By lowering the voltage at the generator, the amount of reactive current is reduced. This is because lower voltage means less force is needed to push the current through the system, resulting in a decrease in reactive current.

3. What methods can be used to lower the voltage at the generator?

There are a few methods that can be used to lower the voltage at the generator, including using reactive power compensation devices such as capacitors or inductors, adjusting the transformer tap settings, and utilizing power factor correction techniques.

4. What are the consequences of high reactive current at the generator?

High reactive current can cause issues such as voltage drops, increased line losses, and decreased power factor. It can also lead to overheating and damage to equipment in the electrical system.

5. How can the reactive current be monitored and controlled to maintain a stable voltage at the generator?

The reactive current can be monitored using instruments such as power analyzers or power factor meters. To control and maintain a stable voltage at the generator, methods such as power factor correction and load balancing can be implemented to reduce the amount of reactive current in the system.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
812
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
942
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
918
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top