- #1
Faiq
- 348
- 16
The bond enthaply of halogens decreases down the group so why is the reactivity of halogens with hydrogens decreases down the group?
X-X + H-H -->2H-XJames Pelezo said:Bond Energy trends are a function of electronegativity in series and of ionic size in groups. In series (consider Series II => Li, Be, B, C, N, O, F & Ne). Electronegativity increases with increasing atomic number due to increasing number of electrons and protons making up the atomic and ionic structures.
The effect of increasing electronegativity of neutral elements in series functions to decrease atomic radius b/c of increased force of electrostatic attraction. Ionizations follow the same trends in series for the Group I - III elements, but C, N, O & F tend to gain electrons causing a large in crease in ionic radius after Boron because of e-/e-repulsion, but electronegative effects still increase from Carbon through Fluoride. The order of increasing electronegativity is C <N<O<F. Applying this concept to chemical bonds (Covalent bonds) consider the C - H bond 1st. The low electronegativity of Carbon does not distort the chemical bond as much as the same bonds in N, O and F leaving a high electron cloud density in the Carbon to Hydrogen bond and results in a reasonably strong bond as compared to N - H, O - H or F - H which are polar covalent in nature. Distortion of the bonds by the highly electronegative N, O and F ions weakens the covalent bonds in these systems.
In groups or families of elements, size of central element plays a greater factor in strength of bond. This is especially true in the halogen family. Considering the compounds H - F, H - Cl, H - Br and H - I, bond strength decreases with increasing atomic number in the order (H - F) > (H - Cl) > (H - Br) > (H - I) due to the addition of principle energy levels (rings) creating a 'shielding effect', 'Shielding' decreases the electrostatic influence of the nucleus on the bond between the valence of the anion and the attached substrate. The acidity of the Hydrogen - Halide group is also referred to as the 'Hydrogen Halide Paradox'
So is this reasoning correct?James Pelezo said:I couldn't structure the energy flow diagram directly, so I typed it out in word and posted in jpeg. Hope this helps.
View attachment 99982
Faiq said:So is this reasoning correct?
Down the group the strength of H-X bonds increases and to form a strong bond more energy is required. As a result due to difference in energy requirements the reactivity of H-X is higher up the group
The reactivity of halogens decreases as you go down the group. This is because, as you move down the group, the atomic radius of the halogens increases, making it more difficult for them to attract an electron and form a bond.
The atomic radius of an element is a measure of its size. As the atomic radius increases, the outermost electrons are further away from the nucleus, making it more difficult for the nucleus to attract and bond with other atoms. This decrease in attraction leads to a decrease in reactivity.
As you go down the group, the number of electron shells in a halogen atom increases. This means that the outermost electrons are shielded by the inner shells, making it more difficult for them to participate in chemical reactions. This leads to a decrease in reactivity.
The halogens at the top of the group (fluorine and chlorine) are the most reactive because they have smaller atomic radii and are able to attract electrons more easily. The halogens at the bottom of the group (bromine and iodine) have larger atomic radii and are less reactive because they are not able to attract electrons as easily.
The reactivity of halogens plays a crucial role in their chemical properties. The more reactive halogens are more likely to form compounds with other elements, while the less reactive halogens are less likely to form compounds. Additionally, the reactivity also affects the types of compounds that are formed, with more reactive halogens forming more stable and stronger bonds with other elements.