Reading a plaque rupture flow chart correctly

AI Thread Summary
Interpreting flow charts in biology can be challenging, particularly regarding the roles of substances in processes like plaque rupture and myocardial infarction (MI). The discussion centers on identifying which substances play dual roles, with the correct answer being Fibrinogen and Antithrombin III. Fibrinogen is involved in both cross-linking platelets and converting to fibrin, while Antithrombin III inhibits the coagulation cascade and thrombin production. Clarification was provided that the two roles for Fibrinogen were not immediately apparent due to the chart's layout. Understanding the flow chart's connections is crucial for accurately interpreting the roles of different substances in biological processes.
K-Feldspar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am having a bit of trouble interpreting flow charts given in my biology question sets.

Given the following stimulus:
iv4O3tm.png

The question is :

In which of the following options does each substance play two different roles in the series of events from plaque ruprture to MI?
  1. ADP and collagen
  2. Collagen and Fibrinogen
  3. Antithrombin III and collagen
  4. Fibrinogen and antithrombin III
The answer (from my book) is:

"Fibrinogen binds to the glycoprotein (GO) IIb/IIIa leading to the cross-linking of platelets. It is also converted into fibrin which stabilises these cross-links and leads to aggregation. Antithrombin III inhibits the activation of the coagulation cascade and also inhibits the production of thrombin. The answer is 4.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The answer shown above doesn't make sense to me.

The Fibrinogen square connects to the "Cross links-platelets via GPIIb/III receptor" square, which THEN connects to the "Platelet cross-links stablised" square (i.e. "Fibrinogen" doesn't directly connect to "Platelet cross-links stablised").

Why does this count as two different roles (as asked for in the question) yet e.g. "Exposure of collagen" connecting to "platelets adhere to collagen" which THEN connects to "Platelet activation release of TXA2 and ADP" not count as "two different roles".

Antithrombin III being involved in two different roles makes more sense as it has arrows pointing to 2 other boxes. None of the other options have these 2 arrows coming out.

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Hi,

It seems I had not read the "converts fibrinogen to firbin" box that sits about the "platelet cross-links stabilised" box.

The two roles were "converts fibrinogen to firbin" and "Cross links-platelets via GPIIb/III receptor" NOT "Cross links-platelets via GPIIb/III receptor" and "platelets adhere to collagen".

Thanks
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top