Reading Speed with Scientific Texts

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the differences in reading speed between scientific texts and fiction works. Participants explore their personal experiences and perceptions regarding the density and complexity of scientific writing compared to more narrative forms of literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants observe that they read fiction much faster than scientific texts, attributing this to the density of information in scientific writing.
  • One participant notes that scientific texts are dense and require careful reading, as each sentence carries significant weight.
  • Another participant contrasts the density of scientific texts with humanities texts, suggesting that the latter can be understood even if parts are skipped.
  • It is mentioned that fiction works are less dense and can be summarized effectively without losing the essence of the reading experience.
  • One participant shares a personal experience of taking about an hour to read a paragraph of scientific text, highlighting the challenge of comprehension.
  • Another participant points out that scientific papers often assume a strong background knowledge and familiarity with referenced works, complicating the reading process.
  • A participant expresses relief in finding others who also read scientific texts more slowly, indicating a shared experience among some members.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that reading speeds differ between scientific texts and fiction, with many expressing that scientific texts require more time and effort. However, the reasons for this difference and the implications of reading density remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors influencing their reading speeds, including background knowledge and the complexity of the material, but do not resolve these factors or their implications.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring reading strategies for scientific literature, educators considering text selection, and students navigating complex academic materials.

vanmaiden
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
Hey physicsforums,

Normally I enjoy reading texts that explain or elaborate on scientific phenomena. Also, normally, these texts take me awhile to read, but I just found out that I can read fiction works A LOT faster than books where I'm legitimately learning something scientific. Is this the same for all of you? How would you compare your reading speeds with fiction works vs. scientific works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vanmaiden said:
Hey physicsforums,

Normally I enjoy reading texts that explain or elaborate on scientific phenomena. Also, normally, these texts take me awhile to read, but I just found out that I can read fiction works A LOT faster than books where I'm legitimately learning something scientific. Is this the same for all of you? How would you compare your reading speeds with fiction works vs. scientific works?

Yes, I think this is certainly true.

The thing is that scientific texts are very dense. There is much information on very little space. So every sentence is important and should be read carefully.

Textbooks in humanities (for example) are much less dense. They contain quite a lot of words to explain a single concept. If you skip a page in a humanities text, then you should still be able to understand most of it. This is not true for science texts!

Fiction works are even less dense than humanities texts. You can easily compress a fiction book to a summary of a few pages. This is impossible with a scientific text.

I'm of course not trying to devaluate humanities texts or fiction works. But it's simply an observation. Scientific texts are dense because there are many symbols which have a very specific meaning. So a lot of the text is being compressed in mathematical symbols and scientific words. This seems to be the best way to present math and science.
On the other hand, humanities texts does not have such a compression. It must use long sentences and words to convey the main ideas.
And fiction works are competely different because their goal is not only to present information, but also to be aesthetically pleasing. If you compress a fiction work to 2 pages, then you might understand everything but you didn't get the reading experience. Where-as scientific texts don't really care about using fancy words.
 
I takes me about an hour per paragraph with scientific texts.
 
Not only do I read texts much slower than fiction, I also reread them. I don't think I ever reread a novel.
 
Problem is not just reading lines for me. But also that papers assume that you have strong background and have read all the references papers also.
 
Glad I'm not the only one here that's a slower reader when it comes to scientific texts :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K