Real Affine Plane: Definition & Properties

  • Thread starter Thread starter tgt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
AI Thread Summary
The real affine plane is defined as an incidence structure with the point set R^2 and a line set consisting of vertical lines and non-trivial lines, emphasizing the natural incidence relation. This definition excludes other geometric shapes like parabolas and circles, as they are derived from the Euclidean metric, which is not part of the affine plane's framework. The focus on vertical and non-trivial lines is to establish a clear structure without introducing complexities from additional shapes. The discussion highlights that in the context of real affine planes, the essential geometric objects are limited to points and lines. Overall, the definition aims to clarify the foundational elements of affine geometry.
tgt
Messages
519
Reaction score
2
Definition of a real affine plane is the incidence structure with point set R^2 and line set the union of the vertical lines and the non-trivial lines, with the natural incidence relation.

Looking here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_plane it seems an affine plane is the usual Euclidean plane minus the metric.

My question why in the above definition talk specifically about vertical lines and non trivial lines? Why isolate these objects? There are many other things to talk about as well like parabolas, circles etc.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tgt said:
Definition of a real affine plane is the incidence structure with point set R^2 and line set the union of the vertical lines and the non-trivial lines, with the natural incidence relation.
I'm not familiar with this definition. What is a vertical line? What is a non-trivial line?
Perhaps you can tell us where you found this definition?

Looking here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_plane it seems an affine plane is the usual Euclidean plane minus the metric.
If we're considering only real affine planes, then this is correct.

There are many other things to talk about as well like parabolas, circles etc.
Sure, but parabolas and circles arise from the Euclidean metric, so there's no need. Also, if someone is interested in a different metric on ##\mathbb{R}^2##, then it might not make sense to add either of those to the definition.
 
So it seems all geometrical objects in the affine plane is defined in terms of points and lines?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top