Real vs. Complex: Understanding the Difference Between su(2) and sl(2) Algebras

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lapidus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Su(2)
AI Thread Summary
su(2) is classified as a real algebra because it is defined over the real numbers (R) with three generators, allowing for real linear combinations. In contrast, sl(2) is a complex algebra defined over the complex numbers (C), where elements are expressed as complex linear combinations of its generators. While the matrices provided for su(2) can also serve as a basis for sl(2) when considered over C, sl(2) is often referred to as sl(2,C) to emphasize its complex nature. The distinction lies in the field over which each algebra is defined, not in the specific matrix representations. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the underlying structure of these Lie algebras.
Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
one standard basis of su(2) are the 2x2 matrices (i 0;0 -i), (0 i; i 0), (0 1;-1 0)

whereas the standard basis of sl(2) are (1 ; 0 -1), (0 1; 0 0), (0 0;-1 0)

Why then is su(2) called a real algebra, but not sl(2)?

thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The answer is the field over which the vector space is defined:
su(2) is a vector space over R with three generators; the general element of su(2) is a real linear combination of the generators.
sl(2) is a vector space over C with three generators; the general element of sl(2) is a complex linear combination of the generators. It's sometimes called sl(2,C) or similar; sl(2,R) would be a different Lie algebra.

Incidentally, the basis you have given for su(2) also does perfectly well as a basis for sl(2), but over C. sl(2) is the complexification of su(2).

From a mathematical point of view the algebra is defined abstractly, without any reference to a basis. The fact that there is a standard representation by matrices with complex or real entries has no bearing on whether the algebra is complex or real.
 
thanks Henry!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top