MHB Real Estate math word problem help

  • Thread starter Thread starter jmathdisinclined
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a real estate math problem related to property valuation based on zoning classifications. The user seeks assistance in determining the correct formulas for calculating the per square foot value of a mixed-use undeveloped property. The calculations reveal that one acre of commercial land costs $13,068, while multi-unit and single-unit residential lands cost $5,227.20 and $2,613.60, respectively. The final answer for the property value is confirmed to be $1.62 per square foot. The user expresses a desire to memorize the solution process and improve their understanding of similar problems.
jmathdisinclined
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am studying to take a real estate exam. I am having problems determining the correct formula on the percentage problems. I need help solving the answer and understanding the correct formula. Help is much appreciated. The math problem is:
The subject is a mixed use undeveloped property with 3 acres zoned commercial,
5 acres zoned multi-unit, and 2 acres zoned single-unit. A similar 10-acre property
recently sold for $1.80 per sf with 4 acres zoned commercial, 4 acres zoned multiunit,
and 2 acres zoned single-unit residential.

Based on this one sale property, what is the per square foot value of the subject
property if multi-unit land typically sells for 40% of commercial land prices, and
single-unit residential land sells for 20% of commercial land prices?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let C be the cost of one acre of "commercial land". Since "multi-unit land typically sells for 40% of commercial land prices" one acre of "multi-unit land" cost .4C. Since "single-unit residential land sells for 20% of commercial land prices" one acre of single-unit residential land" cost .2C.

"A similar 10-acre property recently sold for 1.80 per sf with 4 acres zoned commercial, 4 acres zoned multi-unit, and 2 acres zoned single-unit residential."

There are 43560 square feet per acre so 1.80 per sf is (1.80)(43560)= 78408 per acre.

So 4C+ 4(.4C)+ 2(.2C)= 4C+ 1.6C+ .4C= 6C= 78408. C= 78408/6= 13068 . One acre zoned commercial costs 13068, one acre zoned multi-unit cost .4(13068)= 5227.20, and one acre zoned single unit residential costs .2(13068)= 2613.60.

The question asks for the cost of 3 acres zoned commercial, 5 acres zoned multi-unit, and 2 acres zoned single-unit.

That is 3(13068)+ 5(5227.20)+ 2(2613.60).
 
Thank you Country Boy.

Great job, the answer of $1.62 per sf is correct. Now I will need to figure out how to memorize the way to solve this type of question. There are a few other practice questions I have. I will reverse engineer this equation, and hopefully after a few go through I will have it down. Your help is much appreciated.

Country Boy said:
Let C be the cost of one acre of "commercial land". Since "multi-unit land typically sells for 40% of commercial land prices" one acre of "multi-unit land" cost .4C. Since "single-unit residential land sells for 20% of commercial land prices" one acre of single-unit residential land" cost .2C.

"A similar 10-acre property recently sold for 1.80 per sf with 4 acres zoned commercial, 4 acres zoned multi-unit, and 2 acres zoned single-unit residential."

There are 43560 square feet per acre so 1.80 per sf is (1.80)(43560)= 78408 per acre.

So 4C+ 4(.4C)+ 2(.2C)= 4C+ 1.6C+ .4C= 6C= 78408. C= 78408/6= 13068 . One acre zoned commercial costs 13068, one acre zoned multi-unit cost .4(13068)= 5227.20, and one acre zoned single unit residential costs .2(13068)= 2613.60.

The question asks for the cost of 3 acres zoned commercial, 5 acres zoned multi-unit, and 2 acres zoned single-unit.

That is 3(13068)+ 5(5227.20)+ 2(2613.60).
 
Is "memorizing" all you can do? I recommend learning the basic definitions, tthen thinking!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top