I Real Number Expectation Value: Explanation & QM Example

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expectation value for momentum in quantum mechanics, specifically questioning the reality of a given expression involving complex numbers α and β. It is clarified that the two parts in the expression are complex conjugates, which share the same real component but have opposite imaginary components. Their difference results in a purely imaginary number, which, when multiplied by -i, yields a real number. The initial confusion is resolved, confirming that the expectation value is indeed a real number. This highlights the importance of understanding complex conjugates in quantum mechanics calculations.
dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
hi. I have been looking at a QM example in a book. It works out the expectation value for momentum which I know should be a real number but I can't see how or why the following number is real
α and β are complex numbers with | α |2 + | β |2 = 1 and ω and t are real

-i ( α*β e-iωt -αβ*eiωt)

Can anyone tell me if this is a real number and why?
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The two parts in the bracket are the complex conjugates of each other: They have the same real component but opposite imaginary component. Their difference has a real component of zero, it is purely imaginary. If you multiply that by -i you get a real number.
 
  • Like
Likes QuantumQuest, Delta2 and dyn
Thanks. I just couldn't see it but now I can. Thanks again
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top