Real Sequence As Rational Function in e^-jw

dduardo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,902
Reaction score
3
How do I convert a piece wise function like this:

y[n]=

{1 -N<=n<=N
{0 otherwise

to something like this:

p0+p1e^(-jw)+...+pMe^(-jwM)
------------------------------
d0+d1e^(-jw)+...+dNe^(-jwN)

Basically, what formula do I need to use to calculate the coeffients?

[Edit] I'm trying to use the MATLAB function FREQZ, but requires the formula to be in the above format.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dduardo said:
How do I convert a piece wise function like this:

y[n]=

{1 -N<=n<=N
{0 otherwise

to something like this:

p0+p1e^(-jw)+...+pMe^(-jwM)
------------------------------
d0+d1e^(-jw)+...+dNe^(-jwN)

Basically, what formula do I need to use to calculate the coeffients?

[Edit] I'm trying to use the MATLAB function FREQZ, but requires the formula to be in the above format.

Well, that looks the frequency response of a discrete time system.

I might be wrong, but I'd first get the z-transform of your sequence:

z^N + z^(N-1) + z^(N-2) + ...+ 1 + z^(-1) + z^(-2) + ...z^(-(N-1))+z^(-N)

then plug in z=e^(jwdt)

dt is the time between samples.

e^(jwdtN) + e^(jwdt(N-1)) + ...+ 1 + e^(-jwdt) + e(-jwdt2) + ... e^(-jwdtN)

So that would be your numerator, and the denominator is just 1. Is that form acceptable?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top