Realisability of the third law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Third law
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
My lecture notes had S=A{3nR[ln(T)]/2+nR[ln(V)]}. A arbitary, is the entropy equation for a monotomic ideal gas.

The third law demands S->0 as T->0. But as T->0 in the above equation, S -> -infinity assuming V fixed.

What is wrong?

Or is it the case that S-> -infinity is equivalent to minimum entropy?

V can be made arbitarily small but non zero so when T=0, the entropy must be smaller than any S when T is non zero. This can only happen if S-> -infinity as if it's a finite number than V can always be made smaller so that there exists a V and T such that S is smaller than S when zero T.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just realized that S can be combined to get S=AnR[ln(T^(3/2)V)] with A an arbitary constant than do S=BnR[ln(T^(3/2)V+1)] with B to scale S in order to account for the addition of 1 in the logarithm. So T=0 => S=0 and so the third law is satisfied. Is this accurate?