1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Realisability of the third law?

  1. Jun 15, 2007 #1
    My lecture notes had S=A{3nR[ln(T)]/2+nR[ln(V)]}. A arbitary, is the entropy equation for a monotomic ideal gas.

    The third law demands S->0 as T->0. But as T->0 in the above equation, S -> -infinity assuming V fixed.

    What is wrong?

    Or is it the case that S-> -infinity is equivalent to minimum entropy?

    V can be made arbitarily small but non zero so when T=0, the entropy must be smaller than any S when T is non zero. This can only happen if S-> -infinity as if it's a finite number than V can always be made smaller so that there exists a V and T such that S is smaller than S when zero T.
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 15, 2007 #2
    I just realised that S can be combined to get S=AnR[ln(T^(3/2)V)] with A an arbitary constant than do S=BnR[ln(T^(3/2)V+1)] with B to scale S in order to account for the addition of 1 in the logarithm. So T=0 => S=0 and so the third law is satisfied. Is this accurate?
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Realisability of the third law?
  1. Kepler's Third Law (Replies: 2)