Realistic Goals for Math Career w/ Drama Background?

  • Thread starter Thread starter futurebird
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around an individual's aspirations in mathematics, specifically a desire to learn graph theory, teach subjects like freshman calculus or linear algebra, and continue general math education. With a unique background in drama and experience teaching high school algebra, the individual plans to enroll in graduate school for pure math while preparing by taking an undergraduate course in Complex Variables. Despite the absence of graph theory courses at their institution, they aim to pursue a master's degree and subsequently a PhD to study graph theory. The feasibility of these goals is supported by past success in solid math courses at Carnegie Mellon. Suggestions include utilizing recommended texts on graph theory and potentially establishing a reading course with a professor after demonstrating competence in initial graduate classes. The individual also expresses a commitment to forming a study group for graph theory at their school, despite concerns about the time constraints of fellow students. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of proactive learning and collaboration in pursuing advanced mathematical studies.
futurebird
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I really want to do a few things with mathematics in my life:

1. Learn graph theory.
2. Teach, something like freshman calc or linear algebra
3. Learn more math in general

My backgrounds is a little... shall we say different... as and undergrad I majored in drama (drama as in writing plays) because that's what I got a scholarship to study. On the side I took courses in game theory and linear algebra. I went to carnegie mellon and the math and economics courses I took were really solid. I've always loved math and programming computers.

Then for 4 year I taught high school algebra. I took some more math courses: multivariable calculus, discrete math and some other course required for high school teachers. They were all pretty easy, but at least it kept my mind active.

But, I didn't want to stop learning math! If you major in math education you don't get to go very far... So, I'm enrolling in grad school for pure math instead in a few months. Right now I'm taking undergrad Complex Variables to prepare.

The thing is they have *NO* graph theory courses at my school. But since my math background is a little patchy my plan is to get a masters in pure math and then look for PHD program where I can learn some graph theory.

Is this realistic? I'm not expecting to be a professor at MIT or anything! I'd really enjoy teaching at a community college or something like that. I think I'm the kind of teacher who would be good for students who are a little frightened of math. I enjoyed teaching high school but the material started to bore me after a few years.

I also really NEED a course on differential equations. I've learned them all on my own and I'm worried I'm not strong enough in that area.

I've also read a few books on graph theory, if I could just find some place to study, I think I could skip then intro courses.

I'm in NYC, and I can't really relocate, my husband works for the city...

I'm so desperate I'm thinking of starting a "study group" for graph theory at my school and seeing if I can find some people who want to read papers and do problems with me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sounds promising to me. in nyc you should be able to find anything.
 
futurebird said:
Hello everyone. I really want to do a few things with mathematics in my life:
1. Learn graph theory.
2. Teach, something like freshman calc or linear algebra
3. Learn more math in general
...
I'm enrolling in grad school for pure math instead in a few months.
...
Is this realistic? I'm not expecting to be a professor at MIT or anything! I'd really enjoy teaching at a community college or something like that. I think I'm the kind of teacher who would be good for students who are a little frightened of math. I enjoyed teaching high school but the material started to bore me after a few years.

Well if you did well in some "solid" math courses at Carnegie Mellon, I don't see why your goals would be unrealistic if you do sufficiently well in those first graduate classes.

futurebird said:
The thing is they have *NO* graph theory courses at my school. But since my math background is a little patchy my plan is to get a masters in pure math and then look for PHD program where I can learn some graph theory.

Well, Bollobas, Modern Graph Theory, Springer, 1991 is one of the best books ever published, and has few prerequisites. Diestel, Graph Theory, Springer, 2000 is also superb and in fact these two books cover similar material and complement one another very well. After you've gotten your feet wet, if all goes well in your first graduate courses, I'd urge you to purchase both and try to set up an 2-credit reading course with a friendly professor. A fine ambitious goal would be to understand the statement and proof of the most important theorem in mathematics, the Szemeredi theorem. See http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math/0702396 (the approach in the book by Bollobas is different; Terry Tao's paper is too short to explain the graph theoretic take on this result).

futurebird said:
I'm in NYC, and I can't really relocate, my husband works for the city...

Have you compiled a list of universities within commuting distance which offer graduate math courses and then surfed the deparmental web pages to see what the research interests of the faculty are?

futurebird said:
I'm so desperate I'm thinking of starting a "study group" for graph theory at my school and seeing if I can find some people who want to read papers and do problems with me.

You mean, the school where you will be taking graduate courses? That might be hard, since first year math graduate students are unlikely to have any spare time! But I don't see why a reading course would not be feasible if you can find a professor willing to supervise you (it would be best, I think, to ask only after making a good impression on faculty in your first few graduate courses).
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Back
Top