Is Paradox the Key to Understanding the Ultimate Reality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohaamad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of reality and the concept of paradox, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics. It posits that reality is subjective and that the ultimate reality serves as the source of all causation. The conversation highlights that paradoxes, especially those found in quantum mechanics, represent ultimate logical conclusions that cannot be further derived. These paradoxes are seen as inherent to the nature of reality, suggesting that the forces driving existence are paradoxical in nature. Additionally, there is a distinction made between mathematical logic and human logic, emphasizing that mathematical principles may not always align with everyday human experiences. This misalignment is termed a paradox, prompting a call to rethink conventional logic. The discussion concludes by asserting that quantum mechanics and mathematics are essential frameworks for understanding nature, reinforcing the idea that these concepts are more than mere calculations—they are integral to describing reality itself.
Mohaamad
Reality has connotations of a subjective experience to it. In defining reality; the ultimate reality will be the ultimate source of causation of all of the reality that we see today.

By paradox I mean as the paradoxes associated with quantum mechanics. Whatever drives the nature of things, the physical laws has to be an "ultimate" force. That is it cannot fail. Nothing "owns" this force and it can exist within itself, it does not "need" anything. A paradox is inherent within itself. All logical conclusions are interdependent on others and ultimately to a paradox. A paradox is a representation of an ultimate logical conclusion; no further derivation will be required simply because no further derivation can be achieved, it is the ultimate end, the ultimate reality because it has to be. I short, I can say that a paradox is a concept that our minds can use to concieve of the characteritic nature of what the ultimate explanation or source of reality is.

The "forces" that fuel the nature of things is a paradox. Paradox is a conceptualization of force.

God is a force, a paradox.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I apologize if my english is difficult to understand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
QM is just math.

Math logic does not have to coincide with "human logic" (the one which is obtained from limited everyday experience of "average" human).

So, when math logic does not coincide with "human" logic, then we call such non-coincidence by a word "paradox".

Change your logic.
 
Originally posted by Alexander
QM is just math.

Math logic does not have to coincide with "human logic" (the one which is obtained from limited everyday experience of "average" human).

So, when math logic does not coincide with "human" logic, then we call such non-coincidence by a word "paradox".

Change your logic.

Quantum Mechanics is more than just math, it is the name we apply to a way of describing nature. Geometry is more than just math, it a word that we apply to a way of describing nature. Mathematics is more than just manipulating numbers and symbols, it is a word we apply to a way of describing nature. If any of these had no connection whatsoever to nature they would not exist.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top