Realization we are moving in a system

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the perception of motion within a system, particularly regarding two orbiting planets and their center of mass (CoM). It highlights the challenge of realizing the CoM's motion without a third reference body, as the two bodies can only perceive their relative motion. The absence of an external frame makes it difficult to define the CoM's movement, leading to arbitrary interpretations. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of understanding motion in a closed system. Ultimately, it raises questions about our ability to perceive motion without external references.
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Hello, I am having one question about whether we can realize we are moving in a system, or we think that everything around us is moving away from us.
This question popped up while I was thinking about two let's say planets, orbiting each other... If we are to live on one of them, we'd probably be able to see that the other is moving around us... and doing the calculations in relative coordinates we could understand we are also moving around our CM...
However, what about the motion of the CM? In what way could we "realize" that we are not just orbiting each other, but we are also moving through the whole space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is no third body with which to compare, there is no good way to define the "motion" of the center of mass. As far as the 2 bodies are concerned, the center of mass is stationary. If there is a third body (I'm using this third body to mean an inertial reference frame), we can talk about motion of the center of mass of the 2 bodies with respect to the third one. But if no such third body exists, there's only arbitrary ways to define the CoM motion by arbitrary construction of arbitrary inertial reference frames.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top