Really Important homework take-home test thing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics assignment called the 'airline project,' which involves calculating flight times and drawing vector diagrams for different flight paths. The user is specifically tasked with determining the time it takes to fly from Kansas City to Indianapolis, factoring in wind speeds. Participants emphasize the importance of showing initial effort before receiving help and suggest starting with neat diagrams to illustrate the flight paths. The conversation highlights the need to calculate the resultant vector by combining the flight direction and wind influence. Overall, the focus is on understanding vector addition to solve the assignment effectively.
Advil
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all, I have an assignment for physics that was due two weeks ago and I'm getting really desperate. It's called the 'airline project'. Here's a link to the assignment. I want to know how to go about starting and doing it.

http://www.fiz6qed.org/homework/tests/take3.htm

The percentages are.

top one is 60, bottom is 40.
then the speeds are 40, and bottom one is 60
and cruising speed is 550mph

I have to do KC to Indianapolis.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Advil,

Can you figure out how long it takes to get to Chicago if the windspeed is 40 mph?
 
Advil said:
I want to know how to go about starting and doing it.
You get started by doing the first thing you are asked to do : draw neat diagrams showing the 3 flight paths.

To get any help here, you must show your own effort first. Please read the sticky at the top of this forum, or the second link in my signature line.
 
We have the vectors drawn out already. I only have to do one of the trips, and that's to Indianapolis, other people were assigned the other trips.

To find the time do I just find the resultant vector of the two vectors.. one going straight to Indianapolis and one being the wind?
 
Resultant

OK, the desired result is flying straight towards Indianapolis. Can you make a vector diagram showing this result as the sum of other things?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top