Rearrangement of spring equations not making sense

  • Thread starter Thread starter KKiefhaber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the relationship between angular frequency (ω) and frequency (f) for springs. The correct equation is ω = 2πf, leading to f = ω/(2π), not f = √(ω/2π) as initially suggested. The square root confusion may stem from mixing up this equation with the formula for angular frequency in simple harmonic motion, which is ω = √(K/M). Clarification is provided that there is no error in the standard physics notes regarding these equations. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately applying concepts of frequency and angular frequency in physics.
KKiefhaber
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello All,
Something that has bugged me as I have been working through my Physics notes is the statement:

angular frequency for a spring: ω=2πf AND f=√(ω/2π)

It seems to me that simply rearranging the angular frequency equation would give f=ω/2π.
I am confused as to where the square root is coming from.

Thanks for any clarification anyone can provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There must be something wrong with your notes! ω does equal 2∏f and therefore f = 2∏/ω
 
Maybe you got it confused with the simple harmonic motion eq: \omega = \sqrt{K/M} ?
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top