Rearranging Equations: Finding y in x = (y^3+1)/(y^2+1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Toby_Obie
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Rearranging the equation x = (y^3 + 1)/(y^2 + 1) to isolate y is complex and cannot be simplified without resorting to the cubic formula. The discussion highlights that while attempts to manipulate the equation through factoring and rearranging are possible, they ultimately lead to a cubic equation in y that does not yield a straightforward solution. Participants emphasize that a general solution for y requires knowledge of cubic equations. The consensus is that isolating y in this context is not feasible without advanced algebraic techniques. Thus, the task remains challenging without specific values for x.
Toby_Obie
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I just need some quick help with the following, rearranging the below to make y the subject

Homework Equations



Rearrange x = (y^3+1)/(y^2+1) to find y

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure , not been doing algebra for long
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Toby_Obie! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
Toby_Obie said:
Rearrange x = (y^3+1)/(y^2+1) to find y

Are you sure that's the question?

I don't think there's any way of making y the subject, without knowing the solution to a general cubic equation. :redface:
 
Question is correct - is it possible then ? There must be some way
 


tiny-tim said:
I don't think there's any way of making y the subject, without knowing the solution to a general cubic equation.
You're over complicating a bit. It's probably just solving the equation in terms of y, which itself just means moving somethings to the other side of the equals side.
Remember, what you do to one side of the equals sign, you do to the other side.

hints:
factor
get rid of fractions,
you'll have to move things around in both directions
the answer has a fraction
 
Last edited:
I'm searching for an answer in the following form :

y = f(x)

Can it be done

It may be over complicating but I have to know

Thanks for you help
 
Toby_Obie said:
Can it be done
yes
factor y^3+1, simplify, and you should be able to work it out from there. It's just a lot of shuffling from one side of the equation to the other. Keep stuff in factored form and factor some more.
 
Last edited:
Sorry I don't get it

Could someone help me out ?
 
sorry, not me … i don't get it either :redface:
 
I'm unsure how to release the x and y

x = (y^3+1)/(y^2+1)

x(y^2+1) = (y^3+1)

(xy^2)+x = y^3+1

x-1 = (y^3) - (xy^2) ?

Factoring (y^3+1) only creates (y+1)(y^2-y+1)
 
  • #10
tiny-tim said:
sorry, not me … i don't get it either :redface:

I've spent way too many pages on this, but basically I think you just have to keep rearranging the equations (adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, multiplying) until everything simplifies.

Have you learned complex numbers yet? If so, you can use those to simplify things further.
 
  • #11
story645 said:
I've spent way too many pages on this, but basically I think you just have to keep rearranging the equations (adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, multiplying) until everything simplifies.

Have you learned complex numbers yet? If so, you can use those to simplify things further.

I repeat … I don't think there's any way of making y the subject, without knowing the solution to a general cubic equation.
 
  • #12
tiny-tim said:
I repeat … I don't think there's any way of making y the subject, without knowing the solution to a general cubic equation.
Sorry, I was slow on the uptake and totally missing your hint.
 
  • #13
tiny-tim said:
I repeat … I don't think there's any way of making y the subject, without knowing the solution to a general cubic equation.

story645 said:
Sorry, I was slow on the uptake and totally missing your hint.
Hint? What hint? tiny-tim said exactly that in his first response and you said it was not true.

From x= (y^3+ 1)/(y^2+ 1) we have x(y^2+ 1)= xy^2+ x= y^3+ 1 so y^3- xy^2+ (1- x)= 0. There no way to solve that for y, with general x, except by using the (very complicated!) cubic formula.
 
  • #14
Thanks guys
 
Back
Top