MHB Rearranging simple equation by making x the subject: 205 = ((4*pi*x*f)/c)^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter duckau
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rearranging the equation 205 = ((4*pi*x*f)/c)^2 to isolate x. The initial attempts included manipulating the equation but led to incorrect evaluations. A clearer method was suggested, involving taking the square root and then isolating x by reversing the operations. The final correct expression for x is x = ±(c√205)/(4πf). The participant expressed gratitude for the helpful advice on working backwards in the equation.
duckau
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

It's been a while and I'm a bit rusty.. I am attempting to rearrange the following equation to make x the subject:

205 = ((4*pi*x*f)/c)^2I have attempted:

205/x^2 = ((4*pi)^2*f^2) / c^2
x^2/205 = c^2/(4*pi)^2*f^2

then

x^2 = 205 * (c^2/((4*pi)^3)*f^2)
x = \sqrt{205*(c^2/((4*pi)^2)*f^2)}

Unfortunately my answer doesn't evaluate. Any tips on my process?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi duckau and welcome to MHB! :D

$$205=\left(\frac{4\pi x f}{c}\right)^2$$

$$\pm\sqrt{205}=\frac{4\pi x f}{c}$$

$$\pm\frac{\sqrt{205}c}{4\pi f}=x$$

Does that help?
 
"Back out" of the expression by "undoing" each thing that was done to x:
We have $\left(\frac{4\pi x f}{c}\right)^2= 205$. Since the last thing done is squaring, the first thing we do is take the square root of each side: $\frac{4\pi x f}{c}= \pm\sqrt{205}$. On the left we are dividing by c so multiply both sides by c: $4\pi x f= \pm c\sqrt{205}$. We now have x multiplied by $4\pi f$ so, finally, divide both sides by $4\pi f$:

$x= \pm \frac{c\sqrt{205}}{4\pi f}$.
 
Thanks a lot.. that's exactly what I was after.

I appreciate the advice regarding working backwards instead of attempting to solve the equation!

Regards.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top