Reason for body to slip away from centre of a rotating disc

AI Thread Summary
A body on a rotating disc tends to slip away from the center due to inertia and the limitations of friction, which replaces the internal stiffness of the disc. Centrifugal force acts outward in a rotating frame, while centripetal force, necessary for circular motion, is provided by the disc's internal stiffness and friction. If friction is insufficient, the body will slide in a spiral pattern rather than maintaining a circular path. In an inertial frame, the body exerts an outward force on the disc, while in a rotating frame, centrifugal force is a fictitious force experienced by the body. Understanding these forces is crucial for analyzing motion on rotating systems.
andyrk
Messages
658
Reaction score
5
Why does a body kept on a rotating disc tend to slip away from the centre?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Centrifugal forces (or centripetal forces, different view on the same thing).
It does not slip if you hit the center exactly, but you'll never get that.
 
I disagree. Centrifugal forces are what keeps the disc together as it rotates. Inertia is what causes a body to slip away from the center.
 
paisiello2 said:
Centrifugal forces are what keeps the disc together as it rotates.
That is wrong in both relevant coordinate systems.
In rotating coordinates, centrifugal forces point outwards and the internal stiffness of the disk has to counter them.
In nonrotating coordinates, the elements of the disk need an inwards force to move in a circle, which is provided by the internal stiffness.

For objects on the disk, friction replaces the role of internal stiffness.
 
You're absolutely right. A centrifugal force is an inertial force.
 
In order for the body to travel in a circle, centripetal force needs to be exerted by the disc onto the body, but this is limited by the friction force between the disc and body, and if the body slides on the disc, it moves in a spiral like pattern with both centripetal and tangential acceleration. If the friction force was zero, the body would move in a straight line (assuming it had some initial velocity).

In an inertial frame of reference, centrifugal reaction force would be the real outwards force that the body exerts on the disc. In a rotating frame of reference, centrifugal force is the fictitious force exerted on the body, and there is still a Newton third law pair of forces, the inwards force exerted by the disc onto the body, and an outwards force exerted by the body onto the disc. In a rotating frame of references where the body does not slide on the disc, it experiences no acceleration with respect to the rotating frame.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top