Reasons for error in percentage of oxygen in KClO3 lab

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying reasons for a 30% error in calculating the percentage of oxygen in potassium chlorate (KClO3). Possible causes include rounding errors in mass measurements and incomplete combustion of oxygen during the experiment. Additionally, the open windows in the fourth-floor lab could have led to air drafts, affecting the heating process and potentially altering results. The participant also inquires about the impact of contaminants on their findings. Overall, these factors contribute to discrepancies in experimental results.
GiantSheeps
Messages
83
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



I did this lab on percentage of oxygen in potassium chlorate and I got a percent error of about 30%. I now need to find three reasons for error, and human error does not count. I think one could be that the masses used in calculating the theoretical percentage of oxygen were all rounded off. Another could be that we did not allow all of the oxygen to burn away. Do those two make sense? Also, I need help with a third. My teacher said something about the fact that our lab was on the fourth floor of a building and the windows were all open, could that somehow lead to error? If so, how? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much!

Procedure

1. Weigh a clean dry crucible and cover or Pyrex test tube.

2. Obtain a sample of potassium chlorate, KClO3 , as directed by your instructor. Place about

1.5 g of KClO3 in the weighed crucible, and reweigh. Use the same balance for all weighings

of the same sample

3. Place the crucible with KClO3 on a clay triangle and set the cover slightly ajar.

4. Heat gently for 8 minutes, then strongly for 10 minutes. Be sure the inner-blue cone of the

flame is just below the crucible bottom while you are heating strongly, and that the crucible bottom and/or clay triangle are heated to redness. Allow the crucible to cool to room temperature, which takes at least 10 minutes, and then weigh the crucible and residue.

5. Heat, strongly, a second time for about 5 minutes, cool and weigh. If the weighings after the first and the second heatings are not the same, i.e. they differ by more than 0.02 g; repeat the process of heating and cooling and weighing as needed, until 2 successive weights agree (within +/- 0.02 g).

6. Calculate the experimental percentage of oxygen in KClO3 based on the final weight of container’s contents.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wouldn't hurt to see your numbers. 30% plus or minus?

Was the original compound dry, or could it be wet?
 
  • Like
Likes GiantSheeps
Borek said:
Wouldn't hurt to see your numbers. 30% plus or minus?

Was the original compound dry, or could it be wet?

It was dry, I believe. Here are my numbers:
  1. A. Mass of clean dry crucible 22.130
  2. B. Mass of crucible and KClO3 23.887
  3. C. Mass of crucible and contents after the first heating 23.441
  4. D. Mass of crucible and contents after the second heating 23.407
  5. E. Mass of crucible and contents after the third heating if needed 23.398
1) Calculate the mass of KClO3 used. (From Data B-A)
B - A
23.887 - 22.130
1.757g

2) Calculate the mass of oxygen lost by heating (from data B- final heating)
B -E
23.887 - 23.398
0.489g

3) Calculate the experimental percentage of oxygen in KClO3
__mass lost__ x 100 = calc 2/calc 1 x 100
mass KClO3
0.489/1.757 x 100 =
27.83%

4) Calculate the theoretical percentage of oxygen in KClO3 (from the chemical formula like we do in class).
(O + O + O)/(K + Cl + O + O + O)
(16 + 16 + 16)/(39 + 35 + 16 + 16 +16)
39.34%

5) Calculate the percentage error.
Percentage Error = experimental value– accepted value x 100
accepted value
((27.83 - 39.37)/39.34) x 100 =
29.26%Thank you so much for you help!
 
What effect would contaminants have?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
109K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
50
Views
17K
Replies
5
Views
8K
Back
Top