Recalling the Equation for Slit Width in a Double Slit Interference Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter KBriggs
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the equation for the slit width in a double slit interference experiment, specifically in relation to the angle theta of the interference maxima. A participant suggests that the equation for fringe width, W = (Dλ)/S, may be relevant, where W is fringe width, D is the distance from the slits to the screen, λ is the wavelength of light, and S is the slit separation. However, the original poster clarifies that they are seeking the actual size of the slits rather than fringe width. The conversation highlights the need for a formula that directly relates to slit width without relying on intensity measurements. The request for assistance remains open as the specific equation for slit width is not provided.
KBriggs
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

I need to get the equation for the slit width in a double slit interference experiment (not the distance between slits) that depends on the angle theta to the intferference maxima, and any distances involved in the typical setup. I found one on the forum that involves the intensity of the maxima, but I have no way to measure intensity. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KBriggs said:
Hey all,

I need to get the equation for the slit width in a double slit interference experiment (not the distance between slits) that depends on the angle theta to the intferference maxima, and any distances involved in the typical setup. I found one on the forum that involves the intensity of the maxima, but I have no way to measure intensity. Any help?

well do you mean fringe width over here..!if yes then equation goes like this..

W = (Dλ)/S

Where,
W= fringe width
D=distance from slits to screen
λ= WAVELENGTH of light
S=slit seperation(distance between the slits)..

I hope this is the formula you were looking for.
 
Not the fringe width, but the size of the two slits. ie, the size of the larger gaps in the little diagram here.
|
|
|
|

|
|
|

|
|
|
|
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top