Recast of an expression containing Diracs [tex]\delta[/tex]-function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johnpatitucci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the recasting of an expression involving the Dirac delta function in the context of spherical harmonics completeness relations. The original expression is given by the sum of spherical harmonics, leading to a delta function representation. A proposed rearrangement involves substituting the right-hand side with a cosine function, specifically transforming the delta function from a sine-based to a cosine-based representation. The participants debate the injectivity of the cosine function within the specified range and the implications for the sine term in the expression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical harmonics and their completeness relations
  • Familiarity with Dirac delta functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, particularly sine and cosine
  • Basic grasp of mathematical proofs and justifications in functional transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dirac delta functions in relation to spherical harmonics
  • Explore the injectivity of trigonometric functions, focusing on cosine and its implications
  • Investigate the completeness relation of spherical harmonics in greater detail
  • Learn about functional transformations and their applications in mathematical physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying quantum mechanics or mathematical physics, particularly those working with spherical harmonics and delta functions.

johnpatitucci
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey there,


I got a problem with one recast of an expression which pops up by considering the completeness relation of common spherical harmonics:

[tex]\sum_{l=0}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-l}^{+l} Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)Y^{*}_{lm}(\theta^{\prime},\phi^{\prime}) = \frac{1}{sin(\theta)} \delta(\theta - \theta^{\prime}) \delta(\phi - \phi^{\prime})[/tex]

The question is about the rhs which is sometimes recast like

[tex]\frac{1}{sin(\theta)} \delta(\theta - \theta^{\prime}) \delta(\phi - \phi^{\prime}) = \delta(\cos(\theta) - \cos(\theta^{\prime})) \delta(\phi - \phi^{\prime})[/tex]

After several attempts I just can't explain how to justify that rearrangement. Could you help me please ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It isn't quite the same thing, unless you restrict [itex]\phi[/itex] to be between [itex]-\pi/2[/itex] and [itex]\pi/2[/itex]. In that range, cosine is "one to one" so that [itex]cos(\phi)- cos(\phi)[/itex] if and only if [itex]\phi- \phi'[/itex] which is all that matters for the delta function.
 
Thanks for your reply.

I still don't get it. Cos(x) is not injective between -[tex]\pi /2[/tex] and [tex]\pi /2[/tex] as it is symmetric within this range (take e.g. [itex]\pm \frac{\pi}{4}[/itex] and you obtain [itex]\cos(\pm\frac{\pi}{4}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt(2)}[/itex] ). It would be true if [tex]0 \leq x \leq \pi[/tex]. But nevertheless, what happens to the [tex]1 / \sin(\theta)[/tex] term?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K