Recent mass estimates for Milky and the Local Group

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Local Mass
AI Thread Summary
The study utilizes the Millennium Simulation to refine mass estimates for the Local Group and the Milky Way, revealing a median true mass of the Local Group at approximately 5.27 trillion solar masses. The interquartile range for this estimate is between 12.58 and 12.83 in logarithmic terms. The Milky Way's estimated virial mass is about 2.43 trillion solar masses, with a lower confidence limit of 0.80 trillion solar masses. The methodology employed is noted for its sophistication, involving simulations of dark matter interactions. Recent data from Gaia has provided more precise mass estimates, affirming the Milky Way's mass as being in line with earlier calculations.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.3740
Masses for the Local Group and the Milky Way
Yang-Shyang Li (1), Simon D. M. White (2) ((1) Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, (2) Max-Plank-Institut für Astrophysik)
10 pages, 5 figures, Submitted to MNRAS
(Submitted on 19 Oct 2007)

"We use the very large Millennium Simulation of the concordance LambdaCDM cosmogony to calibrate the bias and error distribution of Timing Argument estimators of the masses of the Local Group and of the Milky Way. From a large number of isolated spiral-spiral pairs similar to the Milky Way/Andromeda system, we find the interquartile range of the ratio of timing mass to true mass to be a factor of 1.8, while the 5% and 95% points of the distribution of this ratio are separated by a factor of 5.7. Here we define true mass as the sum of the 'virial' masses M_{200} of the two dominant galaxies. For current best values of the distance and approach velocity of Andromeda this leads to a median likelihood estimate of the true mass of the Local Group of 5.27\times 10^{12}M_\odot, or \log M_{LG}/M_\odot = 12.72, with an interquartile range of [12.58, 12.83] and a 5% to 95% range of [12.26, 13.01]. Thus a 95% lower confidence limit on the true mass of the Local Group is 1.81\times 10^{12}M_\odot. A timing estimate of the Milky Way's mass based on the large recession velocity observed for the distant satellite Leo I works equally well, although with larger systematic uncertainties. It gives an estimated virial mass for the Milky Way of 2.43 \times 10^{12}M_\odot with a 95% lower confidence limit of 0.80 \times 10^{12}M_\odot."some comments:
Simon White is a top astrophysicist
it isn't easy to estimate the mass of Milky including her dark matter halo
the method that they used to estimate the masses is very beautiful and unlike anything i ever saw before
it involves using a computer simulation (the Millennium simulation) in which 8 billion dark matter chunks (each weighing a billion solar) cruise around under the influence of gravity, inside a large cubic box.

The estimate of the local group mass (mainly the mass of Andromeda+Milky) is 5 trillion solar.
Milky is a little bit under half of that.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top