Recessive gene and dominant gene

  • Thread starter Thread starter thorium1010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gene
AI Thread Summary
Recessive genes are not inherently recessive or dominant; rather, it is the traits they express that are classified as such. The origin of recessive genes often involves genetic mutations that can render one allele non-functional, impacting the phenotype expressed. Dominance typically occurs when one allele does not produce a functional protein, leading to observable traits. For instance, in cases like sickle cell anemia, the same allele can exhibit both dominant and recessive traits depending on the specific phenotypic feature being considered. This complexity highlights the interaction between alleles and their influence on traits, which can be further explored through molecular mechanisms of gene dominance. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the nuances of genetic inheritance and expression.
thorium1010
Messages
178
Reaction score
6
Like the title,
1)Are recessive gene genetic variations of a dominant gene(or normal gene).
2)What is the origin of a recessive gene?
3)Are recessive genes bought on by genetic mutations ?

I know the questions are trivial, but I am not able to clear these concepts.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
thorium1010 said:
Like the title,
1)Are recessive gene genetic variations of a dominant gene(or normal gene).
2)What is the origin of a recessive gene?
3)Are recessive genes bought on by genetic mutations ?

I know the questions are trivial, but I am not able to clear these concepts.
These questions are far from trivial.

The molecular basis of gene dominance has a lot to do with the chemical pathways that lead to a particular phenotype being expressed. Here are links to review article on the mechanisms of gene dominance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_(genetics)#Molecular_mechanisms
“Dominance typically occurs when one of the two alleles is non-functional at the molecular level, that is, it is not transcribed or else does not produce a protein product. This can be the result of a mutation that alters the DNA sequence of the allele. An organism homozygous for the non-functional allele will generally show a distinctive phenotype, due to the absence of the protein product. For example, in humans and other organisms, the unpigmented skin of the albino phenotype[8] results when an individual is homozygous for an allele that prevents synthesis of the skin pigment protein melanin. It is important to understand that it is not the lack of function that allows the allele to be described as recessive: this is the interaction with the alternative allele in the heterozygote.”

http://jmg.bmj.com/content/31/2/89.full.pdf
“The molecular basis of genetic dominance
Abstract

"This review draws on the rapid expansion in knowledge of molecular and cellular biology to classify the molecular mechanisms of dominant mutation. The categories discussed include (1) reduced gene dosage, expression, or protein activity (haploinsufficiency); (2) increased gene dosage; (3) ectopic or temporally altered mRNA expression; (4) increased or constitutive protein activity; (5) dominant negative effects; (6) altered structural proteins; (7) toxic protein alterations; and (8) new protein functions.”

http://www.pearsonhighered.com/sanders1einfo/assets/images/other/sanders-C04.pdf
“Gene Interaction
Interactions between Alleles Produce Dominance Relationships”
 
Last edited:
Drakkith said:
I don't believe the gene itself is recessive or dominant, but the traits that arise because of the genes are dominant or recessive. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recessive_gene#Nomenclature
You are right. This is an important distinction when one allele controls two phenotypic features.
The expression of a particular phenotypic feature is dominant or recessive. However, one allele can control several different phenotypic features, each of which has a different ranking.
For example, consider the allele that usually determines sickle cell anemia.
The allele (i.e., chromosome locus) that controls sickle cell anemia has two genes. Gene A is associated with both sick cell anemia and malaria resistance. Gene B is associated with being free of sickle cell anemia and malaria predisposition.
Gene A is dominant with respect to malaria resistance but recessive with respect to sickle cell anemia. Gene B is recessive with respect to malaria predisposition but dominant with respect to freedom from sickle cell anemia.
If you do the arithmetic (Punnet squares), you find that this means the following. The heterozygous AB person with both genes A and B has no sickle cell anemia and is resistant to malaria. However, a homozygous AA is resistant to malaria but has sickle cell anemia. A homozygous BB person is not resistant to malaria but doesn't have sickle cell anemia.
In an area with lots of mosquitoes and the malaria parasite, natural selection favors a mixed population with both A and B genes.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top