Reconstructing Auto Accident: Truck & Sports Car

  • Thread starter Thread starter gfrant7070
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Auto Crash
AI Thread Summary
Skid marks are crucial for reconstructing auto accidents, as they provide insights into vehicle dynamics during a collision. In this case, a truck collided with a sports car, and after the impact, both vehicles moved together at an angle of 138 degrees. The problem involves calculating the sports car's velocity before the collision using principles of momentum conservation. The relevant equation involves the masses and velocities of both vehicles, emphasizing that momentum is conserved in the system. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving the problem effectively.
gfrant7070
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Skid marks at auto accidents are used to reconstruct traffic accidents. In this particular scenario, a truck of mass 1750kg moving with a velocity of (22m/s, 90 degrees) collided with a sports car of mass 1025 kg moving with an unknown velocity. After the collision, the vehicles stuck together and moved off at an angle of 138 degrees with respect to east (0 degrees). The skid marks are 57m long. If the coefficient of kinetic friction is determined to be .37, what was the velocity of the sports car at the time of the collision? Assume there is level ground at the location of the collision.



The Attempt at a Solution



N/A, I'm stuck on step 1


Any help is appreciated guys, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Step 1 is to find an applicable equation. And it's tough to get stuck there. Think about conservation of momentum.
 
Yeah; through a series of unfortunate events I lost my textbook :( I know there is a somewhat simple equation, but I just don't know what it is. I googled around, but nothing came up. If someone can post the equation for me I can try and just go from there.
 
Momentum is conserved. Momentum is m*v. So m1*v1+m2*v2=m3*v3. Be warned that the v's are vectors. BTW, that's not the sort of equation you should really have to memorize. It's more of a concept than an equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top