Rectifying my logic of Gauss's Law

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
The Blind Watchmaker
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Capture.PNG


Homework Equations


2.PNG

The Attempt at a Solution


E4Πr2 = Q/∈0
49000⋅4Π4.12 =Q/∈0
Q = 91.6 μC
Qshell = Q = 91.6 μC
Qshell = Qinner + Qouter
91.6 = -3.3 + Qouter
Qouter = 94.9 μC

Can someone point out the error? I have skipped too many lectures and I am catching up right now. Any help would be appreciated! :)
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    23.2 KB · Views: 854
  • 2.PNG
    2.PNG
    3.1 KB · Views: 723
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pay close attention to the actual question posed! Precisely what charge are they going for?
 
gneill said:
Pay close attention to the actual question posed! Precisely what charge are they going for?
Ah I think I get it. Since the electric field inside a conductor must be 0, there must exist a charge on the inner surface of the larger shell that is equal and opposite to 3.3 μC. Thus, the remaining charge is 91.6 - 3.3 = 88.3 μC. Is this what you are hinting at?
 
The Blind Watchmaker said:
Ah I think I get it. Since the electric field inside a conductor must be 0, there must exist a charge on the inner surface of the larger shell that is equal and opposite to 3.3 μC. Thus, the remaining charge is 91.6 - 3.3 = 88.3 μC. Is this what you are hinting at?
Something like that, but take care... Sure, the inner shell's charge is matched and effectively "cancelled" by the charge on the inner surface of the outer shell. So what remains on the outer surface must be what Gauss's Law "sees" as the contained charge...
 
gneill said:
Something like that, but take care... Sure, the inner shell's charge is matched and effectively "cancelled" by the charge on the inner surface of the outer shell. So what remains on the outer surface must be what Gauss's Law "sees" as the contained charge...
So if the question is asking for the "charge of the larger shell" it would be 91.6 + 3.3 μC, but since this question is only asking for the outer surface, the charge is taken to be 91.6 μC?
 
The Blind Watchmaker said:
So if the question is asking for the "charge of the larger shell" it would be 91.6 + 3.3 μC, but since this question is only asking for the outer surface, the charge is taken to be 91.6 μC?
Right!
 
gneill said:
Right!
It is 3 AM here but thanks!