Recursive solution of determinants

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinants
Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I'm reading a paper where the determinant of the following matrix is solved for using some kind of recurisve method.

The matrix is given by M_{ij} = A \delta_{i,j} - B \delta_{i,j-1} - C \delta_{i,j+1}, with i,j = 1...N and are NOT cyclic.

The author sets D_N = \texttt{det}\[M_{(N)}\] and writes the equation

D_N = A D_{N-1} - B C D_{N-2},

assumes a solution of the form D_N = \lambda ^N and finds two solutions,

\lambda_{\pm} = (A \pm \sqrt{A^2 - 4 B C}) / 2.


He then notes the initial conditions of D_1 = A and D_2 = A^2 - B C and says that the answer is therefore

D_N = \frac{\lambda_{+}^{N+1} - \lambda_{-}^{N+1}}{\lambda_{+} - \lambda_{-}}.


It's the very last step I don't understand, how did he find D_N?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After a bit of search I see that the method to solve this kind of recurrence relations is to assume a solution of the form A \lambda_1^N + B \lambda_2^N and find A and B from the initial conditions. However this is not exactly the form of the solution here... how come?
 
Why isn't it?
D_N= \frac{\lambda_+}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\lambda_+^n+ \frac{-1}{\lambda_-(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)}\lambda_-^n
is exactly of the form you give.
 
Yes that would be correct, a bad case of dullness. Thanks.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top