MHB Redistributing Percentages: How to Anchor 0 to 10% and Maintain a Total of 100%

  • Thread starter Thread starter kris123
  • Start date Start date
kris123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have a questions. I have these percentages. If I want to anchor 0 to 10%, how do I redistribute the rest of the percentages to still equal 100?

0 33%
1 28%
2 21%
3 11%
4 7%Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Background information as to how the present
distribution was arrived at is required.

Like if 100 apples are used, "0" gives away 23
leaving 10: how is the 23 distributed?

Possibly 28% (23 * .28 = 6.44...so 6?)
to "1", similarly for the others.

A possibility is:
"1" to "4" = 28+21+11+7 = 67
"1"'s ratio: 28/67 ; applying to the 33-10 = 23:
28/67 * 23 = 9.6 : so "1" becomes 28+9.6 = 37.6
Similarly: "2" = 28.2, "3" = 14.8, "4" = 9.4

So new breakdown:
0 10
1 37.6
2 28.2
3 14.8
4 09.4
====
100.0
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top