A Redshift data on stars the same distance from earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the lack of hard research data demonstrating that stars at the same distance from Earth show no detectable redshift differences, which relates to the question of whether the universe has a preferred direction of expansion. It is noted that individual stars within our galaxy do not exhibit expansion due to being bound objects, while nearby galaxies' red- or blue-shifts are primarily influenced by local motions. Cosmological redshift becomes significant only at greater distances, where individual stars cannot be distinguished. For obtaining data on galactic redshifts, the SIMBAD database and other resources are recommended for further research. The conversation emphasizes the need for average measurements across galaxies to understand redshift behavior.
Jim Hasty
Messages
33
Reaction score
8
Can anyone in the cosmology community direct me to hard research data that specifically demonstrates: there is no detectable redshift difference in stars that are the same distance from the Earth but in all different directions. This is of course related to 'does the universe have a preferred direction of expansion', the literature of which I find on google does not provide data, just brief conclusions. Thanks.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Individual stars tend to be visible within our galaxy but there is no expansion of such bound objects. Nearby galaxies have the majority of their red- or blue-shift determined by local motions. It's only when you get to more distant galaxies that cosmological redshift starts to dominate, and by then you cannot make out individual stars. Again their motion would be principally that within the galaxy, what you need to do is measure the average for the whole galaxy.

For hard data on galactic redshifts, I would suggest you start with the SIMBAD database but there are others. Once you know what details you want, you can get more specific advice on search criteria.
 
  • Like
Likes Jim Hasty
GeorgeDishman said:
Individual stars tend to be visible within our galaxy but there is no expansion of such bound objects. Nearby galaxies have the majority of their red- or blue-shift determined by local motions. It's only when you get to more distant galaxies that cosmological redshift starts to dominate, and by then you cannot make out individual stars. Again their motion would be principally that within the galaxy, what you need to do is measure the average for the whole galaxy.

For hard data on galactic redshifts, I would suggest you start with the SIMBAD database but there are others. Once you know what details you want, you can get more specific advice on search criteria.
Thank you so much, George. This is incredible and helpful.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
Back
Top