Reduce the pressure in an air reservoir

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculations related to reducing pressure in an air reservoir, specifically addressing the transitional regime and the equations governing air density and pressure changes. Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the time-dependent nature of air density and pressure, correcting the assumption that certain variables remain constant. The use of the ideal gas law is emphasized to accurately express pressure as a function of time, while also noting that the average density used in calculations may lead to inaccuracies. The conversation concludes with a clarification on relative density, distinguishing between molar density and mass density in the context of gases. Accurate modeling of these variables is crucial for understanding the dynamics of the air reservoir system.
Guillem_dlc
Messages
188
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
An air reservoir at ##T=20\, \textrm{ºC}## and ##p_0=150\, \textrm{kPa}## is emptied by a pump. The volume of the reservoir is ##V=1,5\, \textrm{m}^3##, and the pump evacuates ##\dot{V}=90\, \textrm{l}/\textrm{min}## of air, independent of pressure. Assuming that air is an ideal gas and the process isothermal, determine the time it takes to reduce the pressure to ##p=50\, \textrm{kPa}##.

Solution: ##t=18,3\, \textrm{min}##
Relevant Equations
##\dfrac{d}{dt}\int_{VC}\rho\, dV=\dot{m}##
TRANSITIONAL REGIME: ##\dot{V}=90\, \textrm{L}/\textrm{min}=0,0015\, \textrm{m}^3/\textrm{s}##
$$\dfrac{d}{dt}\int_{VC}\rho\, dV=\dot{m}\rightarrow \dfrac{d}{dt}\rho V=\dot{m}\rightarrow $$
$$\boxed{\rho_{\textrm{air}}}\rightarrow pV=R'T\rightarrow \rho =\dfrac{p}{R'T}\rightarrow 287$$
$$\rightarrow \dfrac{dp}{dt}=\dfrac{\dot{m}R'T}{V}=\dfrac{\rho_{\textrm{air}}\dot{V}R'T}{V}=103,011\, \textrm{Pa}/\textrm{s}$$
$$50000=150000-\dfrac{dp}{dt}t\rightarrow \boxed{t=16,67\, \textrm{min}}$$
$$\rho_{\textrm{average}}\rightarrow p_{\textrm{avg}}=100000\rightarrow \rho_{\textrm{avg}}=1,189\, \textrm{kg}/\textrm{m}^3$$
Would it be well done like this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guillem_dlc said:
##\dot{V}=90\, \textrm{L}/\textrm{min}=0,0015\, \textrm{m}^3/\textrm{s}##
Ok

Guillem_dlc said:
$$\boxed{\rho_{\textrm{air}}}\rightarrow pV=R'T\rightarrow \rho =\dfrac{p}{R'T}\rightarrow 287$$
This doesn't look right. Did you mean to write ##pV = mR'T##, where ##R'## is a constant?

Then ##\rho = \dfrac{p}{R'T}## looks OK. However, ##\rho## clearly changes with time as the amount of air in the tank decreases. So it's not clear how you got 287. What are the units and for what value of time did you calculate this? Did you ever make use of this?

Guillem_dlc said:
$$\rightarrow \dfrac{dp}{dt}=\dfrac{\dot{m}R'T}{V}=\dfrac{\rho_{\textrm{air}}\dot{V}R'T}{V}=103,011\, \textrm{Pa}/\textrm{s}$$
The equation ## \dfrac{dp}{dt}=\dfrac{\dot{m}R'T}{V}=\dfrac{\rho_{\textrm{air}}\dot{V}R'T}{V}## looks OK except for a sign issue. ##\frac{dp}{dt}## and ##\dot m## are negative since the pressure and the mass of the air in the tank decrease with time. But your expression after the second equal sign is positive since ##\dot V## is specified as a positive number.

Note that ## \dfrac{dp}{dt}## is not a constant. You can see this by examining ##\dfrac{\rho_{\textrm{air}}\dot{V}R'T}{V}## which is clearly time-dependent due to the time dependence of ##\rho_{\textrm{air}}##. So, the numerical value that you calculated for ## \dfrac{dp}{dt}## will not be useful.

Guillem_dlc said:
$$50000=150000-\dfrac{dp}{dt}t\rightarrow \boxed{t=16,67\, \textrm{min}}$$
This equation assumes that ##\frac{dp}{dt}## is constant. But, as mentioned above, it is time-dependent.My hint would be to work with your equation ## \dfrac{dp}{dt}= \pm \dfrac{\rho_{\textrm{air}}\dot{V}R'T}{V}## and write it as ## \dfrac{dp}{dt}= \pm \dfrac{\dot{V}}{V}\left(\rho_{\textrm{air}}R'T\right)##.

I wrote ##\pm## to let you decide on the sign. What can you substitute for ##\rho_{\textrm{air}}R'T##?
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and erobz
TSny said:
Then ##\rho = \dfrac{p}{R'T}## looks OK. However, ##\rho## clearly changes with time as the amount of air in the tank decreases. So it's not clear how you got 287. What are the units and for what value of time did you calculate this? Did you ever make use of this?
It looks like they might have used the average density of the air in the tank ## \rho_{air} \approx \rho_{avg}##. I see it in the last line of the OP. If I did the calculation correct, it's not a terrible approximation.

The “287” looks suspiciously like the air specific mass based ##R## value.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and TSny
erobz said:
It looks like they might have used the average density of the air in the tank ## \rho_{air} \approx \rho_{avg}##. I see it in the last line of the OP. If I did the calculation correct, it's not a terrible approximation.

The “287” looks suspiciously like the air specific mass based ##R## value.
Yes, that looks like what they did. It approximates the answer with less than 10% error.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
TSny said:
Yes, that looks like what they did. It approximates the answer with less than 10% error.
I did that yes
 
Guillem_dlc said:
I did that yes
OK. The reason your answer is off somewhat is that the value of ##\rho_{\rm avg}## that you used is not the true time average of ##\rho##. This is because ##\rho## does not decrease linearly with time.

If you want to get the correct answer of 18.3 minutes for the time, then try following the hint at the end of post #2. You should be able to express ##dp/dt## in terms of just ##p## and some constants.
 
  • Like
Likes erobz
TSny said:
OK. The reason your answer is off somewhat is that the value of ##\rho_{\rm avg}## that you used is not the true time average of ##\rho##. This is because ##\rho## does not decrease linearly with time.

If you want to get the correct answer of 18.3 minutes for the time, then try following the hint at the end of post #2. You should be able to express ##dp/dt## in terms of just ##p## and some constants.
OK, I'll try again now, it would be instead of the average density to replace it with ideal gases, wouldn't it?
 
Guillem_dlc said:
OK, I'll try again now, it would be instead of the average density to replace it with ideal gases, wouldn't it?
You substitute using the ideal gas law to remove density from the RHS.
TSny said:
I wrote ##\pm## to let you decide on the sign. What can you substitute for ##\rho_{\textrm{air}}R'T##?
 
erobz said:
You substitute using the ideal gas law to remove density from the RHS.
OK yes, thank you! And the ##p## as a function of ##t## is the same? I mean the ##p## that I then put in the formula.
 
  • #10
Guillem_dlc said:
OK yes, thank you! And the ##p## as a function of ##t## is the same? I mean the ##p## that I then put in the formula.
You mean is ##p## the same as the pressure inside the tank? Yeah.
 
  • #11
erobz said:
You mean is ##p## the same as the pressure inside the tank? Yeah.
I mean here the pressure varies from ##150## to ##50##, then how should I put the pressure when I substitute the density for the ideal gases?
 
  • #12
Guillem_dlc said:
I mean here the pressure varies from ##150## to ##50##, then how should I put the pressure when I substitute the density for the ideal gases?
Quite literally ##p##. The resulting equation is first order separable ODE.
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
  • #13
The number of moles per unit volume in the tank at any time is ##\frac{p}{RT}##, so the rate of change of the number of moles in the tank is: $$\frac{dn}{dt}=-\frac{pV'}{RT}$$The rate of change of pressure is $$\frac{dp}{dt}=\frac{RT}{V}\frac{dn}{dt}$$If we combine these two equations, we obtain:$$\frac{dp}{dt}=-\frac{pV'}{V}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost and Guillem_dlc
  • #14
One thing which is not related: if they give me the relative density of a gas, should I multiply by the density of air or water?
 
  • #15
Guillem_dlc said:
One thing which is not related: if they give me the relative density of a gas, should I multiply by the density of air or water?
What is your definition of "relative density." In this problem, you are working with molar density, not mass density.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
  • #16
Chestermiller said:
What is your definition of "relative density." In this problem, you are working with molar density, not mass density.
Density divided by density of the medium, right?
Yes yes, in the problem we worked with molar density, it was a question that is not related to the exercise.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
$$\rho_{relative}=\dfrac{\rho_{substance}}{\rho_{reference}}$$
Not like this?
 
  • #18
Guillem_dlc said:
$$\rho_{relative}=\dfrac{\rho_{substance}}{\rho_{reference}}$$
Not like this?
I was about to pontificate on how this is just like specific gravity. Then I visited Wikipedia. Someone else had already pontificated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_density said:
Relative density, or specific gravity,[1][2] is the ratio of the density (mass of a unit volume) of a substance to the density of a given reference material. Specific gravity for liquids is nearly always measured with respect to water at its densest (at 4 °C or 39.2 °F); for gases, the reference is air at room temperature (20 °C or 68 °F). The term "relative density" (often abbreviated r.d. or RD) is often preferred in scientific usage, whereas the term "specific gravity" is deprecated.
[...]
Relative density (##{\displaystyle RD}##) or specific gravity (##{\displaystyle SG}## is a dimensionless quantity, as it is the ratio of either densities or weights

$${\displaystyle {\mathit {RD}}={\frac {\rho _{\mathrm {substance} }}{\rho _{\mathrm {reference} }}},}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Guillem_dlc
Back
Top