Reduced homology of sphere cross reals?

  • Thread starter Thread starter redbowlover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cross Sphere
redbowlover
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
tex doesn't seem to be working right...sry for the notation.

Working through of a proof of the generalized jordan curve theorem. Keep getting stuck on calculating the reduced homology of S^n by R, (ie n-sphere cross the real line).


My book (hatcher) seems to imply its 0 except the n^th homology is Z.

But doesn't S^n cross R have dimension n+1? And shouldn't this imply the (n+1)th homology group is Z? Or is this only true of closed manifolds?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
H_{n+1}(S^n\times\mathbb{R},\mathbb{Z}) = 0 because \mathbb{R} is contractible.
 
redbowlover said:
tex doesn't seem to be working right...sry for the notation.

Working through of a proof of the generalized jordan curve theorem. Keep getting stuck on calculating the reduced homology of S^n by R, (ie n-sphere cross the real line).


My book (hatcher) seems to imply its 0 except the n^th homology is Z.

But doesn't S^n cross R have dimension n+1? And shouldn't this imply the (n+1)th homology group is Z? Or is this only true of closed manifolds?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

the homotopy of S^n x R into itself defined by ((s,r),t) -> (s,rt) deforms S^n x R onto S^n
keeping S^n fixed.
 
redbowlover said:
But doesn't S^n cross R have dimension n+1? And shouldn't this imply the (n+1)th homology group is Z? Or is this only true of closed manifolds?

Orientable and closed, in the manifold case.
 
Back
Top