Reduction of C=O: Clemensen vs Wolf-Kischner

  • Thread starter Thread starter net_nubie
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Clemensen and Wolff-Kishner reductions are both methods for reducing ketones to methylene groups. The key difference lies in their reaction conditions; Clemensen employs zinc in an acidic environment, while Wolff-Kishner utilizes hydrazine in a basic setting, typically with hydroxide. This fundamental contrast in acidity and basicity influences the choice of method based on the substrate and desired reaction conditions. Both methods are effective but are selected based on the specific requirements of the organic synthesis. Understanding these differences is crucial for chemists when planning reductions in their experiments.
net_nubie
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Can someone please tell me the difference between Clemensen's reduction and the Wolf-Kisher reduction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, they're related in that they both reduce ketones to the methylene.

The obvious difference is that one's acidic while the other's basic.

Clemmensen uses zinc and a strong acid, while Wolff-Kishner uses hydrazine and a base, often hydroxide.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top