Reference frames for photon collisions

hartin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

My question probably has a simple answer, but I've been scratching my
head over it a little too long so I thought I would ask it here. I
have three initial photons involved in a collision with 4-momenta k1,
k2 and k3. I have two reference frames:

frame 1: the centre of mass frame of photons k1 and k2 (so that 3-momenta k1+k2=0)

frame 2: the centre of mass frame of all photons k1, k2 and k3 (sothat 3-momenta k1+k2+k3=0)

I want to find out what the relativistic beta v/c and gamma 1/Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2 are. So there seems no way to directly find the relative velocity of the two frames is as only photons are involved. I thought
to use the expression for the relativistic doppler shift, but that doesn't seem appropriate.

Can anyone help me out here?

cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using the Lorentz transformation for energy and momentum. That is, if an object (including a photon) has energy E and momentum p in one frame, then in another frame with relative velocity v (with respect to the first frame):

p^{\prime}c = \gamma (pc - \beta E)

E^{\prime} = \gamma (E - \beta pc)
 
thanks, but \beta and \delta are what I'm trying to determine
 
err I meant beta and gamma
 
hartin said:
Hi,

My question probably has a simple answer, but I've been scratching my
head over it a little too long so I thought I would ask it here. I
have three initial photons involved in a collision with 4-momenta k1,
k2 and k3. I have two reference frames:

frame 1: the centre of mass frame of photons k1 and k2 (so that 3-momenta k1+k2=0)

frame 2: the centre of mass frame of all photons k1, k2 and k3 (sothat 3-momenta k1+k2+k3=0)

I want to find out what the relativistic beta v/c and gamma 1/Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2 are. So there seems no way to directly find the relative velocity of the two frames is as only photons are involved. I thought
to use the expression for the relativistic doppler shift, but that doesn't seem appropriate.

Can anyone help me out here?

cheers.
Use: P=k3
E=k1+k2+k3
LT with \beta=p/E in the direction of k3.
 
hartin said:
Hi,

My question probably has a simple answer, but I've been scratching my
head over it a little too long so I thought I would ask it here. I
have three initial photons involved in a collision with 4-momenta k1,
k2 and k3. I have two reference frames:

frame 1: the centre of mass frame of photons k1 and k2 (so that 3-momenta k1+k2=0)

frame 2: the centre of mass frame of all photons k1, k2 and k3 (sothat 3-momenta k1+k2+k3=0)

I want to find out what the relativistic beta v/c and gamma 1/Sqrt(1-(v/c)^2 are. So there seems no way to directly find the relative velocity of the two frames is as only photons are involved. I thought
to use the expression for the relativistic doppler shift, but that doesn't seem appropriate.

Can anyone help me out here?

cheers.

Note that you have only one variable to solve for, \beta. By definition,

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}}

You can (and will have to) invert this to solve for beta as a function of gamma.

If I understand the problem correctly, you have 6 3-vectors as input? I.e. you have the components of k1 in frame1 and frame2, the components of k2 in frame1 and frame2, and the components of k3 in frame 1 and frame 2.

I suppose you could call these k1 and k1', k2 and k2', k3 and k3'?

First step: replace the 3-vectors with 4-vectors. The "missing" component, which is energy, can be found from |k1| = |k2| = |k3| = 0, i.e. E^2 - |p|^2 = 0.

k1 + k2 must be related by a Lorentz transform to (k1'+k2'), because k1' is the Lorentz transform of k1, and k2' is the Lorentz transform of k2.

In geometric units, we know that the components of (k1+k2) are (1,0,0,0). In standard units, this would be (c,0,0,0).

The zeroeth. component of (k1'+k2') will be gamma in geometric units, or c * gamma in standard units.You apparently are not interested in solving for the direction of the Lorentz boost, just it's absolute value?
 
Last edited:
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Back
Top