Reference Frames in Simultaneity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of simultaneity in the context of special relativity, particularly focusing on a scenario involving a moving train and a ball thrown inside it. Participants explore how different observers perceive the timing of events based on their reference frames, including considerations of relative motion, time dilation, and length contraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a ball thrown inside a moving train at 10 mph would appear to take longer to reach the other end from the perspective of a stationary observer on the platform due to time differences.
  • Another participant argues that the speed of the ball relative to the platform observer would be greater than 10 mph, as it must account for the train's velocity, but emphasizes the need for relativistic velocity addition rather than simple addition.
  • A later reply reiterates the importance of using the relativistic law of velocity addition and introduces the concept of length contraction, stating that the train would appear shorter to the platform observer.
  • One participant questions whether the platform observer would see the ball hit the end of the train before the person on the train does, suggesting that this might imply time is perceived differently for the two observers.
  • Another participant counters that at low speeds, there is no time dilation or length contraction, asserting that all observers would agree on the timing of the ball hitting the end of the train.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how simultaneity and timing are perceived by observers in different reference frames. There is no consensus on whether time is perceived differently for the platform observer compared to the person on the train, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of relativistic effects at low speeds.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities of applying relativistic principles to scenarios involving low speeds, with participants referencing both classical and relativistic approaches to velocity addition. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the applicability of relativistic effects in this context.

am2010
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Lets say that a person in a moving train throws a ball in the direction of motion from one end and hits the other end of the train at 10 mph (relative to the person on the train). According to special relativity, from the perspective of a platform observer though they would see the ball having to take marginally longer to reach the other end of the train thus according to the platform's frame, time is different.

However for objects that are traveling at 10mph wouldn't it be the case that (from the platform observer's frame) since the train is moving as well the velocities of the ball is NOT 10mph but instead 10 mph + the train's velocity (Law of Relative Motion). Wouldn't this addition in speed then compensate for the slowing down of time so that the platform observer would see the ball reaching the other end of the train at the same time as the person in the train.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
am2010 said:
However for objects that are traveling at 10mph wouldn't it be the case that (from the platform observer's frame) since the train is moving as well the velocities of the ball is NOT 10mph but instead 10 mph + the train's velocity (Law of Relative Motion). Wouldn't this addition in speed then compensate for the slowing down of time so that the platform observer would see the ball reaching the other end of the train at the same time as the person in the train.
You are correct that with respect to the platform, the speed of the ball is not 10 mph but faster due to the speed of the train itself. But it's not simply 10 mph + the train's velocity. One must add velocities using the relativistic law of velocity addition, which looks like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = \frac{V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}}{1 + (V_{a/b} V_{b/c})/c^2}[/tex]

Instead of this (which is only good for low speeds):

[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}[/tex]

There are other factors to consider, such as length contraction: With respect to the platform, the train is shorter.
 
Doc Al said:
You are correct that with respect to the platform, the speed of the ball is not 10 mph but faster due to the speed of the train itself. But it's not simply 10 mph + the train's velocity. One must add velocities using the relativistic law of velocity addition, which looks like this:

[tex]V_{a/c} = \frac{V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}}{1 + (V_{a/b} V_{b/c})/c^2}[/tex]

Instead of this (which is only good for low speeds):

[tex]V_{a/c} = V_{a/b} + V_{b/c}[/tex]

There are other factors to consider, such as length contraction: With respect to the platform, the train is shorter.

Since we're dealing with low speeds (ball at 10 mph and the train at an even lower speed) then I would use the bottom equation. Since we add the velocities using this relativistic law, isn't it correct that the platform observer sees the ball hitting the other end of the train first BEFORE the person in the train. Thus time is speeding up for the platform observer?
 
am2010 said:
Since we're dealing with low speeds (ball at 10 mph and the train at an even lower speed) then I would use the bottom equation. Since we add the velocities using this relativistic law, isn't it correct that the platform observer sees the ball hitting the other end of the train first BEFORE the person in the train. Thus time is speeding up for the platform observer?
I don't understand your point. If you are only talking about low, non-relativistic speeds, then there's no time dilation or length contraction to worry about. Time is not slowing down (or speeding up) for anyone. All observers will say that the ball takes the same amount of time to travel from one end of the train to the other.

What do you mean when you say that the "platform observer sees the ball hitting the other end of the train first BEFORE the person in the train"?

There's no problem in having everyone's clock synchronized. If the person on the train says the ball hit the end of the train at 1:00 pm, the platform observer will agree.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K