Reflected wave at complex refrective index

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter superg33k
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Index Wave
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
superg33k
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
A plane wave can be described by the real part of the exponential wave equation:

[tex]\mathbf{E}=E_{0}e^{i(kz-wt)}[/tex]

Adding the subscript i or r for incident or reflected waves, the ratio of the amplitude of reflected to incident wave is given by:

[tex]\frac{E_{r0}}{E_{i0}} = \frac{n_1-n_2}{n_1+n_2}[/tex]

But if n2 is complex, then this leads to a complex Er0. What does this mean for the physical wave, the real part of E?

[tex]\mathbf{E}=E_{r0}e^{i(kz-wt)}=(Re\{E_{r0}\}+iIm\{E_{r0}\})e^{i(kz-wt)}=Re\{E_{r0}\}e^{i(kz-wt)}+Im\{E_{r0}\}e^{i(kz-wt+\pi/2)}[/tex]

To me it looks like 2 out of phase waves are reflected. If this is right can you point me somewhere I can read up more about it? Or have I abused some notation somewhere?

Thanks for your help understanding what's going on.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, as you said, you have to take the real part of E, only. A complex E_0 can be written as [itex]|E_0|\exp(i\phi)[/itex]. Hence the reflected wave will be out of phase with the incident one.
For non-perpendicular incidence this leads to the reflected wave becoming partly circularly polarized and is used in elipsometry.