Reflection of sound. Changes to its properties.

AI Thread Summary
When a pure tone is directed at a flat, non-absorbent wall, the primary change observed upon reflection is a decrease in intensity, while frequency, wavelength, and velocity remain unchanged if the wall is stationary. If the wall were moving, the Doppler effect would cause shifts in frequency, but in this scenario, it is stationary. Close to the wall, sound intensity can actually increase due to constructive interference between the incident and reflected waves, resulting in a pressure amplitude that is doubled. This phenomenon is utilized in pressure zone microphones to enhance sensitivity, leading to a significant increase in the detected signal. Overall, the reflection of sound at a stationary wall primarily affects intensity, with notable enhancements in specific proximity to the surface.
buggsndirk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi guys and girls,

Just had a question I have been thinking about for a while.

Suppose you have a sound maker than makes a pure tone at a particular frequency. You play this tone for an instant directed directly at a flat wall (not absorbent at all). If you could measure the reflected tone would there be any change in frequency, intensity, wavelength or velocity?

My gut feeling is that the intensity will lower somewhat, but nothing else will change, but I have a feeling I'm missing something super obvious like a doppler effect or something.

Any and all thoughts are appreciated.

Thanks
 
Science news on Phys.org
Is this wall moving?
If it is moving away, then each wavelength will be reflected a little bit later, which is the Doppler effect (called red shift).
If it is moving toward you, the each wavelength will be reflected a little bit earlier, also the Doppler effect (blue shift).
 
Everything is stationary.

so nothing will change?
 
At longer distances from the reflecting surface, the only difference you will measure is some decrease in intensity, as you said in your Opening Post (OP). But, measure the sound intensity very close to the reflecting surface...expect a surprise!

“Sound intensity near a hard surface is enhanced because the reflected wave adds to the incident wave, giving a pressure amplitude that is twice as great in a thin "pressure zone" near the surface. This is used in pressure zone microphones to increase sensitivity. The doubling of pressure gives a 6 decibel increase in the signal picked up by the microphone.”
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/reflec.html
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top